We performed a comparison between ADONIS and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It is a stable solution."
"It's a very complete solution."
"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."
"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."
"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"The speed and execution of DMN was a big selling point for us. It's very good at conducting business processes that are easily modeled and presented in a way that's easy to understand."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."
"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
ADONIS is ranked 17th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. ADONIS is rated 7.8, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "A strong choice for business process modeling with an easy-to-use drag and drop approach". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Bizagi, IBM BPM and BIC Platform , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM and IBM BPM. See our ADONIS vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
