We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Comindware Tracker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"βIt was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files.β"
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The clean interface, prioritization, and private task lists aren't present in other solutions."
"This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"I love this software because this software helps me to increase team productivity day-by-day.β"
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
Earn 20 points
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 24th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while Comindware Tracker is ranked 46th in Business Process Management (BPM). Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Pega BPM and Mendix, whereas Comindware Tracker is most compared with . See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Comindware Tracker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.