We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"I really appreciate the on-the-go access through the browser and the B2B integration."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"It is a low-code and high-configuration platform, which is very valuable. Develop once and run anywhere is another useful feature. It also has connectors for more than 200 applications. It provides value for money. Our customers who have implemented this solution have a very high ROI."
"The platform is user-friendly."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is stable."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The OIC is very good."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is its performance."
"The initial setup of Oracle Integration Cloud Service was easy."
"Technical support responds quickly."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of customization."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"They should create a custom connector option. With this, they could improve where the user can create the connector, based on their usage."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"The high price of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"The solution doesn't currently have a fully fledged workflow feature like they have in OIM."
"There is a payload size limit and we're unable to integrate some legacy applications."
"The logging capabilities could be enhanced. Currently, logs are only retained for a few days, which can be inconvenient for administrators. Ideally, we'd like the option to configure log retention periods, like a month or fifteen days, instead of the current one-week limit."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service can improve the downloading and uploading of files. I've submitted this issue to the Oracle Idea Labs. The issue is from the front end of Oracle Integration Cloud, we cannot download or upload a file directly or drag and drop it."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and SSIS. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.