We performed a comparison between Brinqa and MetricStream based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Qualys, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management."The most valuable features of Brinqa are its data integration capabilities."
"Key features are usability and ease of configuration. It allows us to have all the information in a single place and provide real-time indicators and information for our executives."
"The interface is mobile-friendly and it is getting a good response from our customers."
"Brinqa could improve in terms of the speed of their service and resource provision."
"I would like to see out-of-the-box integration with more security, it would be helpful."
"We would like to have more dashboards and reports, such as geographical and trend reports in the next version. Also, an improvement in the mobile version would be helpful."
Brinqa is ranked 11th in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management with 1 review while MetricStream is ranked 12th in GRC. Brinqa is rated 7.0, while MetricStream is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Brinqa writes "Allows us to configure the risk algorithm to suit our specific needs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of MetricStream writes "Reasonably priced, stable, with out of the box deployment, and has good local support". Brinqa is most compared with Vulcan Cyber, Axonius, Nucleus, Avalor and Tenable Nessus, whereas MetricStream is most compared with RSA Archer, IBM OpenPages, OneTrust GRC and Workiva Wdesk.
We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
