We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare BrowserStack vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
6,168 views|5,327 comparisons
Parasoft SOAtest Logo
5,970 views|3,331 comparisons
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it.""I like that it offers full device capability.""Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development.""Testing across devices and browsers without maintaining that inventory is invaluable.""The setup was quite simple. The website easily explains how to set it up and if you want to integrate it with BMP tools there are online simple step tutorials.""The product guides and resources are extensive and very helpful."

More BrowserStack Pros »

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

More Parasoft SOAtest Pros »

Cons
"Adding better integration with frameworks, particularly testing frameworks like Robot, would be of more value to customers and make their jobs easier.""Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.""I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms.""Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."

More BrowserStack Cons »

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

More Parasoft SOAtest Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"The price is fine.""This solution costs less than competing products."

More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: I like that it offers full device capability.
Top Answer: Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product.
Top Answer: Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally.
Top Answer: From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly. Some aspects were difficult and therefore less useful for us, perhaps we lack the coding knowledge on that.
Top Answer: We are a large company based in India. The primary use case of this solution is for our REST architecture. Parasoft uses different languages like JSON, XML and SORBS. It's like an API testing tool and… more »
Ranking
16th
Views
6,168
Comparisons
5,327
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
528
Rating
8.0
23rd
Views
5,970
Comparisons
3,331
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
458
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
SOAtest
Learn More
Overview
BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
Parasoft SOAtest is widely recognized as the leading enterprise-grade solution for API testing and API integrity. Thoroughly test composite applications with robust support for REST and web services, plus an industry-leading 120+ protocols/message types.
Offer
Learn more about BrowserStack
Learn more about Parasoft SOAtest
Sample Customers
Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
Lufthansa, Siemens, DirecTV, NZ Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company30%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm7%
Insurance Company6%
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm46%
Government15%
Manufacturing Company8%
Energy/Utilities Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm10%
Manufacturing Company9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business14%
Midsize Enterprise43%
Large Enterprise43%
REVIEWERS
Small Business21%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise68%
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Micro Focus, SeleniumHQ and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

BrowserStack is ranked 16th in Functional Testing Tools with 4 reviews while Parasoft SOAtest is ranked 23rd in Functional Testing Tools with 1 review. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while Parasoft SOAtest is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Test against a huge range of device and browser combinations but expect some connectivity issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Parasoft SOAtest writes "Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved". BrowserStack is most compared with Perfecto, Sauce Labs, LambdaTest, CrossBrowserTesting and Tricentis Tosca, whereas Parasoft SOAtest is most compared with SonarQube, Postman, Coverity, SoapUI Pro and Tricentis Tosca.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.