• Home
  • BrowserStack vs. SmarteSoft Testing Suite

BrowserStack vs SmarteSoft Testing Suite comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo

BrowserStack

Read 25 BrowserStack reviews
8,712 views|6,797 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
SmarteSoft Logo

SmarteSoft Testing Suite

103 views|84 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and SmarteSoft Testing Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Great browser testing across platforms but issues with stability
BrowserStack has allowed us to do tests to cover criteria we couldn't do previously.
Use SmarteSoft Testing Suite?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

    • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    5th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    8,712
    Comparisons
    6,797
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    353
    Rating
    7.9
    42nd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    103
    Comparisons
    84
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    BrowserStack
    SmarteSoft
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
    SmarteSoft Testing Suite brings a highly extensible integrated quality assurance platform to complement team's quality and productivity efforts, driving improvements in project efficiency, end-user experience and business outcomes. SmarteSoft's patented script-less testing technologies reduce time for test case scripting, testing cycles and let you increase both QA/ALM and production efficiencies. Testing Suites include the following: Functional Testing, Performance Testing, Validation Testing, Regression Testing, ALM & Healthcare.
    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    Humanitarian Aid Organization, Columbian Financial Group (CFG), Proxibid, Fremont Investment & Loan, Indiana Pension Systems, Posera
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BrowserStack is ranked 5th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is ranked 42nd in Functional Testing Tools. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while SmarteSoft Testing Suite is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, CrossBrowserTesting and Tricentis Tosca, whereas SmarteSoft Testing Suite is most compared with .

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.