• Home
  • BrowserStack vs. ZAPTEST

BrowserStack vs ZAPTEST comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BrowserStack Logo
BrowserStack
Read 25 BrowserStack reviews
8,670 views|6,779 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ZAPTEST Logo
ZAPTEST
Read 7 ZAPTEST reviews
528 views|277 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Functional Testing Tools
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and ZAPTEST based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools.
To learn more, read our detailed Functional Testing Tools Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anastasiia Demenkova
A widely used solution with a good model device factory but may be difficult for a new user to understand
BrowserStack is widely used across the market and has a large community. So if we have any questions on how to integrate it, we have a wide range... Read more →
Anonymous User
The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation.
I was able to automate an application, where object identifications have impeded any progress in automating the regression bed. With ZAPTEST, we... Read more →
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This solution costs less than competing products."
  • "The price is fine."
  • "There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."
  • "BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."
  • "The price of BrowserStack is high."
  • "Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."
  • "My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."
  • "As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

    • More BrowserStack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.
    Read all 11 answers   →
    What needs improvement with BrowserStack?
    Top Answer:I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product. Accessibility testing is an area of concern where improvements are required.
    Read all 15 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    8,670
    Comparisons
    6,779
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    372
    Rating
    8.0
    32nd
    out of 47 in Functional Testing Tools
    Views
    528
    Comparisons
    277
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    LambdaTest logo
    LambdaTest vs. BrowserStack
    Compared 32% of the time.
    Sauce Labs logo
    Sauce Labs vs. BrowserStack
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Perfecto logo
    Perfecto vs. BrowserStack
    Compared 23% of the time.
    Tricentis Tosca logo
    Tricentis Tosca vs. BrowserStack
    Compared 4% of the time.
    CrossBrowserTesting logo
    CrossBrowserTesting vs. BrowserStack
    Compared 4% of the time.
    More BrowserStack Competitors   →
    Selenium HQ logo
    Selenium HQ vs. ZAPTEST
    Compared 45% of the time.
    OpenText UFT One logo
    OpenText UFT One vs. ZAPTEST
    Compared 20% of the time.
    ReadyAPI logo
    ReadyAPI vs. ZAPTEST
    Compared 18% of the time.
    Automation Anywhere (AA) logo
    Automation Anywhere (AA) vs. ZAPTEST
    Compared 17% of the time.
    More ZAPTEST Competitors   →
    Learn More
    BrowserStack
    ZAPTEST
    Overview
    BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.
    ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing any GUI based software on any modern OS mobile or conventional that includes iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux. ZAP 1Script technology allows users to script test procedure once and execute it on any correspondent application on any platform and environment. ZAP MultiRun technology offers execution of the same test script on multiple workstations and mobile devices at once, and expedites time to test execution. zapFARM offers mobile and conventional device management, by using distributed and multi-site devices and management of devices and users. ZAPTEST is software test automation solution for testing applications cross-platform. ZAPTEST allows testing of any GUI based software on any modern OS, mobile or conventional including iOS; Android; WinMo; Blackberry; Windows; Mac; and Linux, as well as supports testing of Agile and CI development. ZAP main technologies are ZAPTEST; ZAP-fiX; MultiRun; and zapFARM With over 15 years of industry experience implementing test automation processes ZAP also offers professional help to allows enterprises with testing best practices implementing ZAPTEST. Using ZAPTEST test automation teams reducing time to test development and maintenance, expedite test execution cross-platform and manage devices under test remotely within organization
    Sample Customers
    Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG
    AT&T, Ally Financial, Inc. Standard & Poors, Comcast, Boeing Employee Credit Union, Nordstroms, Bank of New Zealand, Aviva France, Delta Airlines, First National Bank of South Africa, Leukemia & Lymphoma Society, American Well, SuperValu, 24 Hour Fitness, Inc., Lexis Nexis, Cspire Wireless, GE Intelligent Systems, Accenture, Shelter Mutual Insurance, Agco
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company55%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Marketing Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company16%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Retailer7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government14%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise26%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business33%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Functional Testing Tools
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while ZAPTEST is ranked 32nd in Functional Testing Tools. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while ZAPTEST is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ZAPTEST writes "The OCR feature allows objects to be identified based on their characteristics. I miss proper help documentation". BrowserStack is most compared with LambdaTest, Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca and CrossBrowserTesting, whereas ZAPTEST is most compared with Selenium HQ, OpenText UFT One, ReadyAPI and Automation Anywhere (AA).

    See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

    We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.