CA eHealth [EOL] vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
views| comparisons
75% willing to recommend
Keysight Technologies Logo
427 views|291 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and Ixia Hawkeye based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
To learn more, read our detailed IT Infrastructure Monitoring Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Pros →

"The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests.""Our customer was happiest with the price of this product.""The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network.""It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games."

More Ixia Hawkeye Pros →

Cons
"I would like to see improved index shifting."

More CA eHealth [EOL] Cons →

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report.""The customization of tests and even the results can be improved.""Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers.""Improvements in network performance are essential."

More Ixia Hawkeye Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."
  • "In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."
  • More Ixia Hawkeye Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.
    Top Answer:Improvements in network performance are essential.
    Top Answer:Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this… more »
    Ranking
    Unranked
    In IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    Views
    427
    Comparisons
    291
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA eHealth Performance Manager
    Learn More
    Overview
    eHealth collects and analyzes key performance information (KPI) across your IT infrastructure to provide real-time and predictive performance analysis. This information can guide your staff toward the corrective actions needed to avoid negative impacts on business processes.
    Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.
    Sample Customers
    BlueCross Blue Shield of Tennessee, Devoteam, Fujitsu Australia and New Zealand , National Informatics Centre, Uttar Pradesh State Unit Lucknow, Punjab National Bank, Racing and Wagering Western Australia, Sicredi
    EMA
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    IT Infrastructure Monitoring
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring. Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while Ixia Hawkeye is ranked 45th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 4 reviews. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while Ixia Hawkeye is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ixia Hawkeye writes "A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas Ixia Hawkeye is most compared with ThousandEyes, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline, NETSCOUT nGeniusONE and SolarWinds NPM.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.