Compare CA NetQoS Performance Center vs. CA Performance Management

CA NetQoS Performance Center is ranked 73rd in Network Monitoring Software while CA Performance Management is ranked 15th in Network Monitoring Software with 15 reviews. CA NetQoS Performance Center is rated 0, while CA Performance Management is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of CA Performance Management writes "Enables us to baseline, trend, historically view performance, and see in real time how the infrastructure is performing". CA NetQoS Performance Center is most compared with SolarWinds Netflow Traffic Analyzer, CA Network Flow Analysis and CA Performance Management, whereas CA Performance Management is most compared with CA eHealth, SolarWinds NPM and CA Spectrum.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use CA NetQoS Performance Center? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Paessler AG, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
At the moment I'm only using 500 sensors. I pay yearly, so it's a cost that's easily swallowed.We used a product called SolarWinds in the past, and its cost was high. Whereas, PRTG came in at a third of SolarWind's cost.Cost was a factor when selecting this solution, but it just did everything we wanted it to do.Our licensing costs are 10,000 euros over three years.We have an unlimited perpetual license, so we just pay support costs and it can scale throughout the organization.We looked at PRTG and SolarWinds. From a cost side perspective, compared to PRTG, and from what you get back from it, PRTG was sort of a hands down the winner.While I am not the person who deals with pricing, I would say that we pay around 1000 pounds a year.It is about £4,500 for the first year, then about another 15 to 20 percent annually after that. So, we are looking at about £1000 running costs a year. When you think about how much an outage costs per minute, it's negligible.

Read more »

Information Not Available
I like the licensing model because it's device-based.They should provide more scalable licensing for the product.Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year.We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Top Comparisons
Compared 13% of the time.
Also Known As
PRTGNetQoS Performance Center
Learn
Paessler AG
CA (A Broadcom Company)
CA (A Broadcom Company)
Overview
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.NetQoS Performance Center is a leading provider of network performance management and service delivery management solutions. NetQoS Performance Center is an important part of CA Technologies Service Assurance solutions.

CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

Offer
Get Started Today

Try it for 30 Days

Learn more about CA NetQoS Performance Center
Learn more about CA Performance Management
Sample Customers
Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust BankEmpowered Networks, LogicalisJack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm13%
Comms Service Provider13%
Construction Company9%
Paper And Forest Products4%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company31%
Comms Service Provider13%
Media Company7%
Government6%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Insurance Company29%
Financial Services Firm21%
Retailer14%
Healthcare Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm32%
Comms Service Provider32%
Government10%
Manufacturing Company6%
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Paessler AG, SolarWinds and others in Network Monitoring Software. Updated: October 2019.
371,639 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email