We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and Observer Apex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"What is most useful is visibility."
"We have been able to get a little bit better at seeing more things in real time and more just in time, so we're less reactionary."
"The most valuable feature of DX Performance Management is the quick way we can collect data without putting much effort. They have a lot of customization and features with the solution internally and out of the box. We can discover the device, and start collecting information. For example, if the device is available, we can receive the CPU and memory utilization, and the interface optimization is simple and very fast to implement."
"The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past."
"You can have thousands of devices inside and hundreds of thousands of interphases without a problem."
"It saves time having it all on one place, so you do not have to jump around from different tools and try to merge the data. It is already done for you."
"When we deployed it, right out of the box we were able to stand up Performance Management within two weeks, in our production environment, with full discovery and relevant information, actual information, that we could use in our command center, our 24/7 operations center."
"The ability to quickly do drag and drop customized reports for dashboards."
"Network visibility is the most valuable feature."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"For CA PM, there should be a way of easily migrating the reports coming from eHealth going to CA Performance Center, since CA PC is replacing eHealth."
"DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool."
"CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets."
"Since we are out of registered IP space, we are moving to ipv6 and we expect our vendors to move with us, and they have not delivered yet."
"The solution could improve the database model. It is also not very good because they have a lot of interconnections with other data sources, such as NFA and VNA."
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it."
"Policies could be improved."
"We experience disconnections between the solutions own components."
"The pricing and AI can be improved."
DX Performance Management is ranked 36th in Network Monitoring Software with 31 reviews while Observer Apex is ranked 93rd in Network Monitoring Software with 1 review. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while Observer Apex is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Observer Apex writes "Has good network visibility ". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, Zabbix and OmniPeek, whereas Observer Apex is most compared with .
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
