We performed a comparison between CA Process Automation and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."It is easy to debug and troubleshoot."
"This tool is used in my organization for automating IT infrastructure related incidents or service requests."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"Make some of the features more open source that way developers can have more flexibility."
"It needs auto-triggering of workflows based on machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)."
"OCR capability should be added as a feature."
"Somehow the product group within CA left the product dry from some regular expression functionality."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
CA Process Automation is ranked 29th in Process Automation while WorkflowGen is ranked 34th in Process Automation. CA Process Automation is rated 8.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of CA Process Automation writes "Provides the ability to import objects as new versions of existing objects and to make the prior version the current version". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". CA Process Automation is most compared with BMC TrueSight Orchestration, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with .
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
