We performed a comparison between CA Risk Authentication [EOL] and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.Earn 20 points
CA Risk Authentication [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Authentication Systems while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 3rd in Authentication Systems with 52 reviews. CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA Risk Authentication [EOL] writes "If we spot anomalies we can step up authentication. The policy entrance should learn from that state rather than reverting back to what it believes is the static good". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". CA Risk Authentication [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiToken, Fortinet FortiNAC, Microsoft Entra ID and Cisco Duo.
See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.
We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.