CA Unified Communications Monitor vs Scout APM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
18 views|15 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
Scout Logo
674 views|583 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Good end-to-end monitoring""We use the solution to meet the needs of the customer."

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Pros →

"The product can scale."

More Scout APM Pros →

Cons
"All the features and functions of the solution can be improved.""The solution should have automatic baseline detection."

More CA Unified Communications Monitor Cons →

"I can't recall coming across any missing features."

More Scout APM Cons →

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Unified Communications Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer:The product can scale.
Top Answer:Users pay for licensing on a yearly basis. In general, the pricing is great. It's very reasonable.
Top Answer:I can't recall coming across any missing features. Its capabilities are pretty broad.
Ranking
Views
18
Comparisons
15
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
674
Comparisons
583
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
628
Rating
10.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
CA UC Monitor
Learn More
Scout
Video Not Available
Overview

CA Unified Communications Monitor is a unified communications monitoring solution that evaluates and reports on the network’s support of real-time applications in multi-vendor environments, so that Network Administrators can optimize the network’s quality of service and end user experience.

Scout APM is an application performance monitoring solution that simplifies the troubleshooting process by enabling developers to discover and repair performance problems before clients ever notice them. Scout APM uses a developer-based UI with real-time alerting and intuitive tracing logic to identify bottlenecks precisely to the source code. This helps to greatly reduce time and effort needed to debug code and results in greater productivity and improved outcomes.

Scout APM facilitates the ability of developers to break down, discover, and prioritize performance issues such as N+1 queries, latent database queries, memory bloat, and more, and accomplishes these results at a fraction of the cost. Scout APM monitors Elixir, Node.js, PHP, Python and Ruby.

Scout APM is built by developers, for developers.

Scout APM Features

  • 24/7 monitoring: Continuous, consistent monitoring proactively keeps users apprised of any performance deviations. Intuitive dashboards allow users to deep-dive into specific requests, paths, users, and endpoints attached to any performance slowdowns or bloating.

  • Quick and easy analysis: Should a slowdown occur or an increased response time be discovered, users have an easy to use drag-and-drop option to simply and quickly analyze every endpoint and dissect any anomalies. Scout APM will pinpoint the precise user or endpoint(s) responsible for the problem.

  • Intuitive trace logic: Users are able to quickly deep-dive and discover slow requests based on average responses or any/all requests.

  • Crossfilter powerhouse: Crossfilter is a Scout APM feature that allows users to quickly discover similarities with any/all slow requests back to the user or endpoint.

  • Easily discover bottlenecks: With Scout APM, users can easily pinpoint bottlenecks to the exact source code without any additional custom instrumentation. The solution uses a production-safe profiler to fully examine users' custom codes.

  • Developer tracing: Scout APM uses backtraces that are embedded with git blame output so developers of the code can be quickly identified and contacted to resolve issues and concerns immediately.

  • Cost-effective: Scout APM is an open-source solution and offers many flexible pricing options to meet any size business, from small to enterprise level, including custom options. The cost per transaction decreases based on usage and works very efficiently with applications with very high throughput. Scout APM also offers a free trial period and encourages its usage so users can best understand and gauge the level of service needed and determine the best pricing plan to meet organizational needs. Scout APM is considered to be significantly cheaper than many other APM solutions in the marketplace today.

Reviews from Real Users

“The solution is stable. It's pretty easy to set up, especially if you have the knowledge base and/or you have a partner assist you. The product can scale. The processes are great. It helps with services and microservices. The product is great for many different industries, including energy, government, finance, and more. It's allowed our company to be more forward-thinking and to consider the future a bit more. ” - Antonio B., Regional Manager LatAm at Splunk

Sample Customers
BBVA Compass
Chargify, Synctree, Aptuitiv, Barnes and Noble, Journey, Geosnapshot, Kongregate, PaperTrail, Adobe, SendGrid, Sentry
Top Industries
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company18%
Retailer16%
Financial Services Firm8%
Comms Service Provider7%
Company Size
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business37%
Midsize Enterprise13%
Large Enterprise50%

CA Unified Communications Monitor is ranked 5th in Unified Communications Monitoring while Scout APM is ranked 30th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 1 review. CA Unified Communications Monitor is rated 6.6, while Scout APM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CA Unified Communications Monitor writes "Good end-to-end voice quality monitoring and offers valuable features". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Scout APM writes "Great visibility and reliability with fair pricing". CA Unified Communications Monitor is most compared with , whereas Scout APM is most compared with Zabbix, Datadog, Prometheus, Grafana and New Relic.

We monitor all Unified Communications Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.