We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is simple to use. The user experience is very good."
"The modeler is useful for creating the flow. The way to access the data through their REST API is also valuable. This is what we're using right now."
"The integration with almost any language, product, and even human tasks, is valuable. It's very seamless to integrate into existing systems. It doesn't require you to rewrite a lot of your existing system. That's where it really stands out."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The best feature is the automation."
"Camunda Platform has a very good interface for workflow and business process design."
"The flexibility characteristic in a BPMS, through BPMN and DMN, is undoubtedly the most interesting feature for our business."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"There are a few things that I'm missing. For instance, the user interface creator, which I know other systems have, like Aurea or Lombardi, which are IBM solutions. The interface creator, including the data model creator or some module which would allow the users who are not programmers or business consultants and who are not technically skilled in database and Java programming, to create data models and user interfaces."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with . See our Camunda vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
