Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Camunda Logo
33,229 views|20,177 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
ELMA BPM Logo
208 views|160 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Camunda and ELMA 365 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill.""Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate.""I like everything about the entire BPM that comes with the BPM suite.""The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me.""The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process.""Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes.""The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it.""It is an absolutely stable solution."

More Camunda Pros →

"A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics."

More ELMA 365 Pros →

Cons
"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI.""It lacks some preset features and configurations which would make it more plug-and-play for customers.""While it's very scalable, it would be great if auto-scaling capabilities were added to it... one area that really could help out would be to have dynamic resizing of the cluster. Right now, you have to do capacity planning.""We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved.""The product does not have a dictionary.""I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java.""When trying to design rule tables the solutions graphical user interface could improve, it could be more user friendly.""The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."

More Camunda Cons →

"Customers want improved productivity."

More ELMA 365 Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is less cost-prohibitive than other solutions on the market. This solution was in our price range."
  • "We are using the open-source version of this solution."
  • "Camunda is much cheaper."
  • "I use the open-source free version."
  • "The open-source version of the product is free to use."
  • "The cost of this solution is better than some competing products."
  • "Licensing costs are anywhere from $80,000 to $100,000 USD per year."
  • "We use the open-source version, which can be used at no cost."
  • More Camunda Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten."
  • More ELMA 365 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You can… more »
    Top Answer:Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to… more »
    Top Answer:Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very… more »
    Top Answer:A lot of customers, when we introduce this kind of product into their organization, it provides a lot of analytics.
    Top Answer:I rate the solution's pricing a five out of ten. It's not so cheap and not so expensive.
    Top Answer:Our customers mention three main topics when they review our product. The first point of improvement is the cost, the second one is they want improved productivity, and the last point would be… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    33,229
    Comparisons
    20,177
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    911
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    208
    Comparisons
    160
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Apache Airflow logo
    Compared 21% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Pega BPM logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    IBM BPM logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Appian logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Bitrix24 logo
    Compared 40% of the time.
    Bizagi logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Camunda BPM
    ELMA BPM
    Learn More
    Camunda
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Camunda enables organizations to orchestrate processes across people, systems, and devices to continuously overcome complexity and increase efficiency. A common visual language enables seamless collaboration between business and IT teams to design, automate, and improve end-to-end processes with the required speed, scale, and resilience to remain competitive. Hundreds of enterprises such as Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone orchestrate business-critical processes with Camunda to accelerate digital transformation. To learn more visit camunda.com.

    What is ELMA 365?

    ELMA 365 is a low-code BPM platform that helps businesses accelerate digital transformation and innovate faster. With ELMA365 you can deliver enterprise-grade apps and automate processes with little to no coding.

    ELMA 365 Applications

    ELMA 365 integrated applications cover all your business needs:

    • Sales & Customer Relationship Management (CRM);

    • Content and Document Management (ECM);

    • Project Management;

    • Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

    and more.

    The BPM app allows non-technical users to effortlessly create even the most complex business processes. Drag-and-drop process designer provides simplicity for modelling and accelerates the implementation of changes. Built-in monitoring tools help find bottlenecks and improve overall company’s performance.

    The CRM app introduces a holistic approach to customer relationships management and sales. The whole process is automated and managed from the lead acquisition to closed deal, including processing of documentation and post-sale service.

    The ECM app facilitates document management and electronic data exchange, all powered by a BPM engine.

    The Projects app helps employees plan and control project activities, communicate, stay within budget and on schedule.

    The RPA app prevents human errors and speeds up the working process by delegating routine tasks to software robots.

    Sample Customers
    24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando
    Air Astana, GS Nanotech, Kapital Bank, Mriya Resort & SPA, Obninskorgsintez, VestaBank, pwc, Zarubezhneft, lockobank, Rosatom
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company23%
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Government13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm26%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Insurance Company6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business46%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise33%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise70%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while ELMA 365 is ranked 47th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 1 review. Camunda is rated 8.2, while ELMA 365 is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ELMA 365 writes "A great ERP for medium and even small businesses". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas ELMA 365 is most compared with Bitrix24 and Bizagi.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.