We performed a comparison between Camunda and Everest Blueriq based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM)."Being able to use a Java-based solution makes the product flexible."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."
"The most valuable feature of Camunda Platform is its Microservices architecture, which is easily integrable with APIs."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"It allows me to present or to demonstrate the business process flow, visually, without having to resort to PowerPoint, Visio, or other products."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"It is quite easy to build a simple process without any knowledge of programming."
"The biggest benefit of using the product is identifying the issues, enabling a more flexible working method."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"I'm from the .NET world and I would like to use it, rather than Java."
"The latency of API could be decreased."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."
"The only drawback is the time that it takes to have a complete set of workflows implemented on the Camunda platform."
"The GUI needs to be improved, with more configuration options."
"The initial set up could be simplified, it's complex."
"The platform's initial setup process could be better."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while Everest Blueriq is ranked 33rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while Everest Blueriq is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Everest Blueriq writes "Stable platform with valuable case management capabilities ". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas Everest Blueriq is most compared with Pega BPM.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
