We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText Operations Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."The most valuable feature is the ability to share the logic within the rules engine with the business, so you can put it up for everybody to read."
"The product is stable."
"Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"We are documenting all of the processors and VPN. Then we are sharing it with our business users."
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"The best feature is the automation."
"It is an absolutely stable solution."
"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."
"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."
"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."
"It has a Postgres database at the backend, and it is very difficult to scale if you increase the number of processes running. We did hit some barriers. We were able to overcome them, but it was a problem. Camunda has another product called Camunda Cloud, which supposedly doesn't have the same scalability problems, but we are not using Camunda Cloud because the set of features is smaller than Camunda On-Premises. So, its scalability can be improved. Because it has a single database, it is more difficult to scale if you have a huge success."
"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"Community support is basically what I'm looking for. Other than that, it is okay for now."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The support offered by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."
"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."
"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."
More OpenText Operations Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 1st in Process Automation with 69 reviews while OpenText Operations Orchestration is ranked 17th in Process Automation with 24 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText Operations Orchestration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Orchestration writes "HP OO blows away the competition, but has its fair share of flaws". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText Operations Orchestration is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Control-M, BigFix, Microsoft System Center Orchestrator and Appian.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
