Gurvijay BhattiSenior Solutions Architect at Department of Justice
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
"I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs."
"We pay around $200,000 annually."
"The price of this product is higher than that of competitors."
"We used to pay about $100,000-$120,000 US or somewhere around there. That was a bit cost-prohibitive for us to continue."
"It is very expensive."
Earn 20 points
Caucho Resin is ranked 10th in Application Server while IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 2nd in Application Server with 9 reviews. Caucho Resin is rated 0.0, while IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.2. On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Bad documentation, does not scale well, and has a lot of complexities". Caucho Resin is most compared with Tomcat, JBoss and Oracle WebLogic Server, whereas IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with JBoss, Tomcat, IBM BPM, Oracle WebLogic Server and JBoss Enterprise Application Platform.
See our list of best Application Server vendors.
We monitor all Application Server reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.