Compare IBM WebSphere Application Server vs. JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

IBM WebSphere Application Server is ranked 8th in Application Infrastructure with 3 reviews while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is ranked 15th in Application Infrastructure with 1 review. IBM WebSphere Application Server is rated 7.6, while JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of IBM WebSphere Application Server writes "Valuable connection management and scalability but is quite expensive". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JBoss Enterprise Application Platform writes "Good performance and scalability for our online transaction processing". IBM WebSphere Application Server is most compared with Tomcat, Oracle WebLogic Server and JBoss, whereas JBoss Enterprise Application Platform is most compared with NGINX Plus, Microsoft .NET Framework and Apache Web Server.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Microsoft and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2020.
396,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution is robust. The connection management and the scalability, which IBM provides to the Stack, are also valuable.The most valuable feature of this solution is Portal Virtualization.High availability, alert management, and deployments are the most valuable features for us. We have the ND version so we can do deployments.

Read more »

The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and performance.

Read more »

Cons
They should make the solution more lightweight and not bundle everything into a single product.In the next release of this solution, I would like to see support for the Arabic language.The footprint could be reduced so that we can use a smaller virtual machine to run the application. We could also use more scripts. I would like this solution to be more script oriented, rather than GUI oriented.

Read more »

This solution needs better management UI.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
I don't remember the price, but there are no additional costs.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.
396,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
Views
5,472
Comparisons
4,518
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
431
Avg. Rating
7.8
Views
773
Comparisons
711
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
92
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Also Known As
WebSphere Application ServerJBoss EAP, Red Hat EAP
Learn
IBM
Red Hat
Overview
IBM WebSphere Application Server provides a range of flexible, secure, Java EE 7 runtime environments available on premises or across any public, private or hybrid cloud.Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (JBoss EAP) is an open source platform for modern Java applications deployed in any environment. JBoss EAP’s architecture is modular, and cloud ready. The platform offers powerful management and automation for greater developer productivity. It is based on the open source Wildfly project (formerly known as JBoss Application Server).
Offer
Learn more about IBM WebSphere Application Server
Learn more about JBoss Enterprise Application Platform
Sample Customers
TalkTalk, Property management group, E.SUN Bank, Ohio National Financial Services, Aviarc, Cincom Systems, FJA-US, D+H, Staples, Michigan Municipal LeagueAPD, Banco Azteca, Roche, Tata Sky, Frost Bank
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company43%
Comms Service Provider17%
Government13%
Retailer8%
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, F5, Microsoft and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: January 2020.
396,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.