Compare Cavisson NetForest vs. Check Point Security Management

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Devo Logo
Read 9 Devo reviews.
9,912 views|3,980 comparisons
Cavisson NetForest Logo
71 views|32 comparisons
Top Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pricing and Cost Advice
"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less.""We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom.""Be cautious of metadata inclusion for log types in pricing, as there are some "gotchas" with that.""I'm not involved in the financial aspect, but I think the licensing costs are similar to other solutions. If all the solutions have a similar cost, Devo provides more for the money.""Devo is definitely cheaper than Splunk. There's no doubt about that. The value from Devo is good. It's definitely more valuable to me than QRadar or LogRhythm or any of the old, traditional SIEMs.""[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

More Devo Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."

More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: It's very, very versatile.
Top Answer: Devo, like other vendors, doesn't charge extra for playbooks and automation. That way, you are only paying for the side… more »
Top Answer: I need more empowerment in reporting. For example, when I'm using Qlik or Power BI in terms of reporting for the… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: It is good when it comes to access control, which is the basic feature that we use in a firewall appliance or solution… more »
Top Answer: Support is the main area that they need to improve. Our support experience is not very smooth. We are based in Africa… more »
Top Answer: We use it for both perimeter and internal defense.
Comparisons
Also Known As
NetForest
R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Learn More
Cavisson
Video Not Available
Overview

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Cavisson NetForest is the next generation software that makes use of server logs to troubleshoot performance issues and to understand user behavior. NetForest allows its users to slice and dice machine-generated Big Data for decision-making insights. Pattern recognition and correlation analysis are some of the strong features to help software developers and performance engineering teams carry-out root cause analysis for optimizing application performance.

R80.30 Cyber Security Management features centralized management control across all networks and cloud environments, increasing operational efficiency and lowering the complexity of managing your security. Learn more about Security Management.

Offer
See Devo in Action

See how Devo allows you to free yourself from data management, and make machine data and insights accessible.

Learn more about Cavisson NetForest
Learn more about Check Point Security Management
Sample Customers
United States Air Force, Rubrik, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText
Macy's, Michael's, Art.com
Hedgetec, Geiger
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company26%
Comms Service Provider21%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Manufacturing Company45%
Financial Services Firm18%
Security Firm9%
Insurance Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider28%
Manufacturing Company12%
Financial Services Firm5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business11%
Midsize Enterprise11%
Large Enterprise78%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business49%
Midsize Enterprise16%
Large Enterprise35%
No Data Available
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise48%
Large Enterprise41%
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, IBM, Datadog and others in Log Management. Updated: September 2021.
536,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cavisson NetForest is ranked 50th in Log Management while Check Point Security Management is ranked 5th in Log Management with 17 reviews. Cavisson NetForest is rated 0.0, while Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Helps our security team create policies in a centralized way". Cavisson NetForest is most compared with , whereas Check Point Security Management is most compared with ELK Logstash, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM QRadar, LogRhythm NextGen SIEM and AT&T AlienVault USM.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.