Compare Cavisson NetStorm vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"Designs dynamic scripts and scenarios, as per our requirements, which is one the most important feature available in NetStorm. It helps us to do performance testing of our application in a periodic way.""NetStorm can generate high load with a single machine. Its Runlogic feature is very useful to send load to cover each and every flow of the application. NetStorm gives the feasibility of generating load with multiple load arrival models helping components to be tested based on its usage."

More Cavisson NetStorm Pros »

"The most valuable feature is that you can create an infrastructure on-demand and do performance testing with it.""The usability and ability to integrate with other solutions is quite good. When I use it in on Azure, then Red Hat is the most likely solution I use. When I use AWS, then I tend to use Lambda functions. In either case, it works well and you can use it either way.""The most valuable feature is that we do not have to accommodate the load-testing infrastructure in our own data center.""The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of tracing. The process starts in the background. It sees what peaks of volumes that the process can handle. It's easy to use because it's script based, record, and playback. I"

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pros »

Cons
"Need to add or support some more APIs in the Script Manager window.""The user interface had to be improved for the product. Its user interface should be made simple and easy to customize as per user needs."

More Cavisson NetStorm Cons »

"Improvements to the reporting would be good.""I don't know of any features that should be added. The solution isn't lacking anything at this point.""There are three modules in the system that are different products packaged into one, and they can sometimes be difficult to figure out, so they should be better integrated with each other.""I would like for there to be better integration with other tools so that when you do load testing you can also do a security check."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
"There is no monthly or yearly cost but rather, the fees are based on the amount of traffic that you use."

More Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Load Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: The record and playback feature is the most valuable feature. It's all driven by the script, so it's a script-based tool where the background tracing starts. Java's background process does a lot of… more »
Top Answer: It's a subscription-based, pay-per-user license. I wouldn't say it's expensive. Because it was an on-premise license, it was a costly affair. Only certain stakeholders could use it. Now, it is… more »
Top Answer: The performance has really improved in terms of running test cycles. The product used to crash on-premises and when it had a lot of trades being pumped in. Because it is memory intensive, it used to… more »
Ranking
7th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
769
Comparisons
413
Reviews
2
Average Words per Review
640
Rating
9.5
5th
out of 23 in Load Testing Tools
Views
6,403
Comparisons
4,257
Reviews
4
Average Words per Review
486
Rating
7.8
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
StormRunner Load, LoadRunner Cloud, and Micro Focus StormRunner Load
Learn More
Cavisson
Video Not Available
Overview

Cavisson NetStorm is a cost-effective, performance enhancing and easy-to-use appliance for enterprise applications. It is an extremely powerful load generator that provides an accurate estimation of Client Perceived Response Time (CPRT) enabling IT companies to guarantee the Service Level Agreements (SLA). Its advanced technology efficiently handles load variables, user realism, application realism and network realism. NetStorm is a proven solution providing root cause of the issues where legacy solutions failed, prompting Several Fortune 100 companies switching over to using NetStorm.

Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is a simple, smart and scalable cloud-based load and performance testing solution for agile and DevOps teams. It helps you to detect performance issues and ensure that your mobile and web apps are ready for the load. It provides an Intelligent and predictive analytics for fast problem detection and scale up to millions of user in minutes from different regions.

Offer
Learn more about Cavisson NetStorm
Learn more about Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud
Sample Customers
Oracle, Macy's, Redbox, art.com, Pronto Networks, A10 Networks, Renesas, San Jose Medical Group
Alfa Bank, N Brown Group, University of Copenhagen, McGraw-Hill, Cognizant
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Retailer92%
Computer Software Company8%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Retailer35%
Computer Software Company25%
Energy/Utilities Company19%
University4%
REVIEWERS
Educational Organization50%
Financial Services Firm25%
Engineering Company13%
Retailer13%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company41%
Comms Service Provider11%
Financial Services Firm8%
Insurance Company5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise74%
REVIEWERS
Small Business23%
Midsize Enterprise27%
Large Enterprise50%
Find out what your peers are saying about Cavisson NetStorm vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2021.
509,641 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cavisson NetStorm is ranked 7th in Load Testing Tools with 2 reviews while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is ranked 5th in Load Testing Tools with 4 reviews. Cavisson NetStorm is rated 9.6, while Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetStorm writes "Has monitoring capabilities integrated into it to see the performance of components while the test is in the running phase". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud writes "Offers good record and playback and endurance features ". Cavisson NetStorm is most compared with Apache JMeter and Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, whereas Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud is most compared with Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional, Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, Apache JMeter, BlazeMeter and Neotys NeoLoad. See our Cavisson NetStorm vs. Micro Focus LoadRunner Cloud report.

See our list of best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Load Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.