Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management vs Radware LinkProof comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management and Radware LinkProof based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Saurabh-Pal
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use the HDX protocol, a high-performing component of the Citrix solutions. We also use provisioning to generate VM and NetScaler ADC solutions to propose access to applications for our customers."

More Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management Pros →

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.""Provides good performance and scalability.""The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof is that it supports link load balance.""The performance and stability are the most valuable features.""The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability."

More Radware LinkProof Pros →

Cons
"We discussed problems with the network products with the Indian teams. The support center for network products is located in India. There are language barriers and issues with the time difference, so we sometimes face restrictions when dealing with this team."

More Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management Cons →

"Could have more customizations on the dashboard.""The solution lacks HA configuration.""Radware LinkProof's marketing efforts need improvement to raise awareness about its capabilities and compete effectively in the market.""Radware LinkProof’s customer support could be improved.""There are certain features I would like to see in the next release."

More Radware LinkProof Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Radware LinkProof is neither cheap nor expensive."
  • "Price-wise, the solution is a reasonable one."
  • More Radware LinkProof Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Radware LinkProof for traffic distribution is its DNS management capability.
    Top Answer:I would say Radware LinkProof falls into the mid-range pricing category. It is not cheap, but it is also not overly expensive.
    Top Answer:I use Radware LinkProof to optimize our network by balancing multiple WAN links. It ensures uninterrupted access to applications by automatically redirecting traffic from failed or congested links.
    Ranking
    Views
    167
    Comparisons
    103
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    557
    Comparisons
    450
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Citrix ITM
    LinkProof
    Learn More
    Overview

    With billions of real user measurements a day, from every corner of the internet, Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management monitors internet traffic issues in real time and automatically steers your traffic to avoid them.

    Whether you host your applications and content on premises, in the cloud or in content delivery networks (CDNs), Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management allows you to globally load balance all traffic, dynamically optimizing the user experience and lowering service costs. Citrix uses real-time machine learning to direct user requests to the most suitable content source.

    Radware LinkProof NG link load balancer cloud-based applications, is a multi-homing and enterprise gateway solution that offers service level availability and continuous connectivity of enterprise. It is an application-aware multi-homing and link load balancing module that delivers WAN optimization for 24/7 continuous connectivity and service level assurance for corporate and cloud-based applications. LinkProof NG scales from 100Mbps up to 160Gbps and can be deployed in entry-level to high-end data centers as well as enterprise branch offices.
    Sample Customers
    Dataport, Bet365, VFLI, Rhode & Schwartz
    Papa John's, OSRAM, ADP, NYLS
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Retailer7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Citrix, HAProxy and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: April 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is ranked 19th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while Radware LinkProof is ranked 13th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 5 reviews. Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is rated 8.0, while Radware LinkProof is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management writes "It's a robust and proven solution that we've been working with for many years". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware LinkProof writes "Supports link load balance and has good stability". Citrix Intelligent Traffic Management is most compared with Citrix NetScaler, whereas Radware LinkProof is most compared with Radware Alteon, A10 Networks Thunder ADC, Fortinet FortiADC and HAProxy.

    See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.