We performed a comparison between Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade and Cisco Secure Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption."This software has helped individuals in the organization avoid data loss."
"It keeps the devices well monitored."
"They have Disc Encryption, Anti-Malware, and a VPN Blade which is beneficial for us."
"It is a cross-platform tool."
"It's easily scalable and adaptable to the needs of the business."
"Encryption prevents data loss which can cost the organization a lot of resources."
"Its ability to provide a security layer of encryption that allows us to prevent unauthorized access to computers."
"It helps us maximize the operational efficiency and performance of our activities."
"The stability of the solution is perfect. I believe it's the most stable solution on the market right now."
"The most valuable feature is signature-based malware detection."
"Integration is a key selling factor for Cisco security products. We have a Cisco Enterprise Agreement with access to Cisco Email Security, Cisco Firepower, Cisco Stealthwatch, Cisco Talos, Cisco Threat Grid, Cisco Umbrella, and also third-party solutions. This is key to our security and maximizing operations. Because we do have the Email Security appliance and it is integrated with Threat Response, we have everything tied together. Additionally, we are using the Cisco SecureX platform, as we were a beta test for that new solution. With SecureX, we are able to pull all those applications into one pane for visibility and maintenance. This greatly maximizes our security operations."
"It provides real-time visibility and control over endpoints, allowing its users to promptly respond to any security incidents and remediate any vulnerabilities."
"Device Trajectory is one of the most valuable features. We're able to dig in and really understand how things came to be and where to focus our efforts."
"Definitely, the best feature for Cisco Secure Endpoint is the integration with Talos. On the backend, Talos checks all the signatures, all the malware, and for any attacks going on around the world... Because Secure Endpoint has a connection to it, we get protected by it right then and there."
"It is extensive in terms of providing visibility and insights into threats. It allows for research into a threat, and you can chart your progress on how you're resolving it."
"The VPN is most valuable. It's the best thing in the market today. We can use two-factor authentication with another platform, and we can authenticate with two-factor."
"They could improve the latency in the platform when entering the portal."
"The tool is too expensive to be an add-on to the main solution. They could launch it independently so that costs can be lowered."
"The tool should be able to recover data from a stolen device."
"I would like to bring centralized management to mobile devices."
"Regarding the general topic of support, many have annoyances with it."
"While the solution works as it should, it is overly expensive."
"They should improve the interface and make it a little more user-friendly."
"The response time for technical support could be faster."
"The one challenge that I see is the use of multiple endpoint protection platforms. For instance, we have AMP, but we also have Microsoft Windows Defender, System Center Endpoint Protection, and Microsoft Malware Protection Engine deployed. So, we have a bunch of different things that do the same thing. What winds up happening is, e.g., if I get an alert for a potential incident or malware and want to pull the file, I'll go to fetch the file to analyze it. But, one of these other programs has already gotten it, so the file has already been quarantined by another endpoint protection system. AMP doesn't realize that and the file fetch fails, then you're left wondering what's going on."
"In the next release, I would for it to have back up abilities. I would like the ability to go back to a point in time to when my PC was uninfected and to the moment of when the infection happened."
"It does not include encryption and decryption of local file shares."
"Integration and dashboard are areas with certain shortcomings in Cisco Secure Endpoint."
"In the next version of this solution, I would like to see the addition of local authentication."
"Due to the complexity of the technology that is used and its advanced threat detection capabilities, it is possible to encounter many delays in operation."
"The technical support is very slow."
"The initial setup of Cisco Secure Endpoint is complex."
More Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is ranked 4th in Endpoint Encryption with 16 reviews while Cisco Secure Endpoint is ranked 10th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 43 reviews. Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is rated 8.6, while Cisco Secure Endpoint is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade writes "Centralized management with full disk encryption and helpful authentification capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cisco Secure Endpoint writes "Single dashboard management, quick infrastructure threat detection, and high level support". Check Point Full Disk Encryption Software Blade is most compared with Microsoft BitLocker and McAfee Complete Data Protection, whereas Cisco Secure Endpoint is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, CrowdStrike Falcon, Check Point Harmony Endpoint and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
