We performed a comparison between Check Point Pointsec [EOL] and McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, McAfee, Sophos and others in Endpoint Encryption."One of the characteristics that give us the most value is that it offers the ability to perform HTTPS inspections."
"Check Point GAiA is easy to use."
"At the time when this tool was launched on the market, it had new technologies integrated within."
"Full disk encryption helps us ensure that data stored on a device is encrypted."
"What I like about McAfee Total Protection is that it's working. I also like that it doesn't require any specific knowledge to set up."
"The product is largely stable."
"The stability of the solution can be good. However, the configuration takes a long time for it to be done properly."
"The whitelisting works well."
"You can manage your compliance in line with legislation such as GDPR and POPIA."
"The most valuable feature right now is the user control."
"The solution is very user-friendly and valuable."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to control access to USB drives and other external devices."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pros →
"The installation was quite complex."
"In the next release of this solution, I would like to see application identity support."
"The UI was one of the most difficult points to get used to. Due to the UI, even though it was used every day, the administration was complicated."
"We would maybe want (in the future) advanced security in the filtering of access to the metaverse by augmented reality cameras."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by making the customer aware of the benefits of the solution which would increase the adoption. Additionally, if there were features to suit multi-cloud environments it would be helpful. If the solution can intelligently identify which is important data for the organization and should not be released from the organization without authorization would be a benefit."
"We need to do a lot of configuration."
"Integration with other vendors could be improved. For example, with Chrome or Firefox."
"The product fails to offer automatic classification capabilities to its users."
"McAfee needs to clarify its rules."
"McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention could improve by having artificial intelligence."
"Lacks GDPR regulations to enhance security."
"It could improve how it deals with solar data."
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Cons →
More McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Pointsec [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Encryption with 4 reviews while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is ranked 9th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 29 reviews. Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is rated 8.0, while McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Check Point Pointsec [EOL] writes "Very good disk encryption, secure authentication, and centralized administration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention writes "Highly beneficial DLP functionality, full system protection, and useful file scanning". Check Point Pointsec [EOL] is most compared with , whereas McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, HP Wolf Security, Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, Cisco Secure Endpoint and Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention.
We monitor all Endpoint Encryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
