We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and FileAudit based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is good when it comes to access control, which is the basic feature that we use in a firewall appliance or solution. Check Point is effective when it comes to security control and threat prevention."
"It provides for capabilities and has allowed us to be more scalable."
"Security Management gives us complete visibility into our security operations, allowing administrators to identify and address problem areas, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve efficiency. It offers detailed reports on network usage and security, which helps my company to monitor and control its security expenses."
"The product has done a great job in protecting our business network and SCADA systems."
"The firewall's blades are the solution's most valuable feature."
"The log dashboard in the SmartConsole is very useful and convenient for monitoring and tracking."
"The reporting system provides real-time insights into the security situation and shows measures that can be taken to protect our data."
"The support is pretty incredible. Check Point has support rep programs that go all the way up to putting one of their own people in your business to help you. Then, they have support programs. If you're an expert, you just need to be able to download updated files and stuff. They have support programs like that, too."
"It is a good and stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"Our customer acquires the complete report which is kept for future auditing purposes."
"Alerting upon file changes is the most valuable aspect of the product."
"The tool is expensive."
"It would be helpful if we could enable URL and application traffic control remote access."
"In the last version from 80.20, there are some issues around SSNA Diction. I would like this to be improved."
"Being a security appliance, there should be the ability for the Security Management server to send email alerts via authenticated email."
"The web administration tool that allows administration in the browser must be developed even more."
"I would like to bind users to their network, as well as their local office machine."
"I would like this solution to be integrated directly into the Cluster XL equipment."
"The tracking of new threats could be improved."
"The updates management and central management console could be improved."
"Whenever someone cuts and paste, it shows as "file is deleted"."
"The DLP function, including installation of the agent on the workstation and controlling the DLP restrictions, are areas where the product lacks."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Check Point Security Management is ranked 9th in Log Management with 55 reviews while FileAudit is ranked 42nd in Log Management with 3 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while FileAudit is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of FileAudit writes "A scalable SIEM solution for monitoring a user's activity in the file server". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas FileAudit is most compared with ManageEngine File Audit Plus. See our Check Point Security Management vs. FileAudit report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.