We performed a comparison between Check Point Security Management and Mezmo based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Log Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The unique management using Smart Console for all firewalls is very useful."
"The interface also makes it easy for us to configure the VPN from the GUI rather than the command line, which makes it easy even for less experienced engineers to work with."
"The product has done a great job in protecting our business network and SCADA systems."
"It is good when it comes to access control, which is the basic feature that we use in a firewall appliance or solution. Check Point is effective when it comes to security control and threat prevention."
"URL filtering is a very important feature."
"The firewall's blades are the solution's most valuable feature."
"Having the possibility to use Smart Event to check for threats on a broader scale helps after a security incident and also makes it easier to check - instead of looking through different logs."
"The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."
"The solution aggregates all event streams, so that if there are any issues, it's all in the same interface."
"LogDNA consolidates all logs into one place, which is super valuable."
"The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy."
"Being a security appliance, there should be the ability for the Security Management server to send email alerts via authenticated email."
"The tracking of new threats could be improved."
"Check Point could improve by enhancing the networking in their solution in order to align it with the existing network architecture."
"For those not familiar with the Command Line interface, there should be an option in the GUI for operating backups."
"They could offer educational courses to help individuals improve their knowledge and skills."
"Some of the configuration elements could be improved."
"I've found the solution was a bit unstable."
"No ability to encapsulate a query or a filter, and communicate or share that among the team."
"Every once in a while, our IBM cloud operational implementation gets behind. Sometimes, when we have a customer event, we do not get access to the latest logs for about 30 minutes, particularly for the sites that are heavily utilized. This is clearly not good. It is impossible to RCA when you can't look at the logs that pertain to the time period in which the event occurred. It could be more of an operational problem than a feature problem. I don't have visibility about whether it is a LogDNA issue or just an operational issue."
More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Check Point Security Management is ranked 9th in Log Management with 55 reviews while Mezmo is ranked 51st in Log Management. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Mezmo is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mezmo writes "Has vastly increased our ability to reach SLA targets consistently". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Splunk Cloud Platform, whereas Mezmo is most compared with Datadog and Cribl Stream. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Mezmo report.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.