Compare Checkmarx vs. Coverity

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Veracode Logo
70,664 views|37,885 comparisons
Checkmarx Logo
48,764 views|34,010 comparisons
Coverity Logo
20,882 views|16,112 comparisons
Most Helpful Review
Ethel Kornecki
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx vs. Coverity and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"We are using the Veracode tools to expose the engineers to the security vulnerabilities that were introduced with the new features, i.e. a lot faster or sooner in the development life cycle.""The most valuable feature comes from the fact that it is cloud-based, and I can scale up without having to worry about any other infrastructure needs.""I have used this solution in multiple projects for vulnerability testing and finding security leaks within the code.""We used it for performing security checks. We have many Java applications and Android applications. Essentially it was used for checking the security validations for compliance purposes.""Veracode is a valuable tool in our secure SDLC process.""Integrations into our developer's IDE (Greenlight) and the DevOps Pipeline SAST / SourceClear Integrations has particularly increased our time to market and confidence.""The source composition analysis component is great because it gives our developers some comfort in using new libraries.""Veracode's cloud-based approach, coupled with the appliance that lets us use Veracode to scan internal-only web applications, has provided a seamless, always-up-to-date application security scanning solution."

More Veracode Pros »

"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are the Best Fix Location and the Payments option because you can save a lot of time trying to mitigate the configuration. Using these tools can save you a lot of time.""The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete.""Our static operation security has been able to identify more security issues since implementing this solution.""Overall, the ability to find vulnerabilities in the code is better than the tool that we were using before.""The most valuable features are the easy to understand interface, and it 's very user-friendly.""The solution is always updating to continuously add items that create a level of safety from vulnerabilities. It's one of the key features they provide that's an excellent selling point. They're always ahead of the game when it comes to finding any vulnerabilities within the database.""The user interface is excellent. It's very user friendly.""The most valuable feature is the simple user interface."

More Checkmarx Pros »

"The solution has helped to increase staff productivity and improved our work significantly by approximately 20 percent.""The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution.""The features I find most valuable is that our entire company can publish the analysis results into our central space.""Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime.""The most valuable feature is the integration with Jenkins.""The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at.""It provides reports about a lot of potential defects."

More Coverity Pros »

Cons
"Veracode should make it easier to navigate between the solutions that they offer, i.e. between dynamic, static, and the source code analysis.""I would like to see expanded coverage for supporting more platforms, frameworks, and languages.""Ideally, I would like better reporting that gives me a more concise and accurate description of what my pain points are, and how to get to them.""One of the things that we have from a reporting point of view, is that we would love to see a graphical report. If you look through a report for something that has come back from Veracode, it takes a whole lot of time to just go through all the pages of the code to figure out exactly what it says. We know certain areas don’t have the greatest security features but those are usually minor and we don’t want to see those types of notifications.""It needs better controls to include/exclude specific sections when creating a report that can be shared externally with customers and prospects.""Improve Mobile Application Dynamic Scanning DAST - .ipa and .apk""I think for us the biggest improvement would be to have an indicator when there's something wrong with a scan.""One feature I would like would be more selectivity in email alerts. While I like getting these, I would like to be able to be more granular in which ones I receive."

More Veracode Cons »

"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too.""The reports are good, but they still need to be improved considering what the UI offers.""It would be really helpful if the level of confidence was included, with respect to identified issues.""Checkmarx being Windows only is a hindrance. Another problem is: why can't I choose PostgreSQL?""We have received some feedback from our customers who are receiving a large number of false positives.""In terms of dashboarding, the solution could provide a little more flexibility in terms of creating more dashboards. It has some of its own dashboards that come out of the box. However, if I have to implement my own dashboards that are aligned to my organization's requirements, that dashboarding feature has limited capability right now.""The tool is currently quite static in terms of finding security vulnerabilities. It would be great if it was more dynamic and we had even more tools at our disposal to keep us safe. It would help if there was more scanning or if the process was more automated.""I would like to see the rate of false positives reduced."

More Checkmarx Cons »

"They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier.""The quality of the code needs improvement.""The setup takes very long.""I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse.""Ideally, it would have a user-based license that does not have a restriction in the number of lines of code.""It should be easier to specify your own validation routines and sanitation routines.""Its price can be improved. Price is always an issue with Synopsys."

More Coverity Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"They just changed their pricing model two weeks ago. They went from a per-app license to a per-megabyte license. I know that the dynamic scan was $500 per app. Static analysis was about $4500 yearly. The license is only for the number of users, it doesn't matter what data you put in there. That was the old model. I do not know how the new model works.""They have just streamlined the licensing and they have a number of flexible options available, so overall it is quite good, albeit pricey.""For the value we get out of it, coupled with the live defect review sessions, we find it an effective value for the money. We are a larger organization.""I don't really know about the pricing, but I'd say it's worth whatever Veracode is charging, because the solution is that good.""Veracode's price is high. I would like them to better optimize their pricing.""If I compare the pricing with other software tools, then it is quite competitive. Whatever the price is, they have always given us a good discount.""Veracode is expensive. Some of its products are expensive. I don't think it's way more expensive than its competitors. The dynamic is definitely worth it, as I think it's cheaper than the competitors. The static scan is a little bit more expensive, around 20 percent more expensive. The manual pen test is more expensive, but it is an expensive service because it's a manual pen test and we also do retests. I don't think it is way more expensive than the competitors, but it's about 15 to 20 percent more expensive.""We use this product per project rather than per developer... Your development model will really determine what the best fit is for you in terms of licensing, because of the project-based licensing. If you do a few projects, that's more attractive. If you have a large number of developers, that would also make the product a little more attractive."

More Veracode Pricing and Cost Advice »

"We have a subscription license that is on a yearly basis, and it's a pretty competitive solution.""This solution is expensive. The customized package allows you to buy additional users at any time.""It's relatively expensive.""The interface used to create custom rules comes at an additional cost.""The number of users and coverage for languages will have an impact on the cost of the license."

More Checkmarx Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Coverity is quite expensive.""The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code.""The price is competitive with other solutions.""It is expensive."

More Coverity Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security solutions are best for your needs.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Veracode has offered a dynamic analysis testing solution for several years, having launched our first offering in 2015… more »
Top Answer: I would recommend them. They have the ability to cover multiple languages and come with all the features you would… more »
Top Answer: SonarQube depends on completely what you configure the Rules. You will have the option of the Profile creation and can… more »
Top Answer: The major difference I have seen between Checkmarx and SonarQube is : CheckMarx support: Supports a large number of… more »
Top Answer: Coverity is quite stable and we haven’t had any issues or any downtime.
Top Answer: Coverity is quite expensive. Generally, for security scanning products, the pricing is very expensive. Some solutions… more »
Top Answer: I would like to see integration with popular IDEs, such as Eclipse. If Coverity were available as a plugin then… more »
Popular Comparisons
Compared 50% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Compared 42% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 2% of the time.
Compared 49% of the time.
Compared 6% of the time.
Compared 3% of the time.
Also Known As
Synopsys Static Analysis
Learn
Veracode
Checkmarx
Synopsys
Overview

Veracode covers all your Application Security needs in one solution through a combination of five analysis types; static analysis, dynamic analysis, software composition analysis, interactive application security testing, and penetration testing. Unlike on-premise solutions that are hard to scale and focused on finding rather than fixing, Veracode comprises a unique combination of SaaS technology and on-demand expertise that enables DevSecOps through integration with your pipeline, and empowers developers to find and fix security defects.

Checkmarx CxSAST is a highly accurate and flexible Static Code Analysis product that allows organizations to automatically scan un-compiled / un-built code and identify hundreds of security vulnerabilities in all major coding languages. CxSAST is available as a standalone product and can be effectively integrated into the Software Development Lifecycle (SDLC) to streamline detection and remediation. CxSAST can be deployed on-premise in a private data center or hosted via a public cloud.

Whitepaper: I, II

Coverity® gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix.

Offer
Learn more about Veracode
Learn more about Checkmarx
Learn more about Coverity
Sample Customers
State of Missouri, ReknerYIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLCMStar Semiconductor, Alcatel-Lucent
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm32%
Insurance Company11%
Computer Software Company8%
Engineering Company5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm8%
Manufacturing Company5%
REVIEWERS
Computer Software Company36%
Financial Services Firm29%
Pharma/Biotech Company7%
Manufacturing Company7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company35%
Comms Service Provider15%
Financial Services Firm12%
Insurance Company5%
REVIEWERS
Media Company14%
Government14%
Retailer14%
Transportation Company14%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company32%
Manufacturing Company18%
Comms Service Provider16%
Retailer5%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business22%
Midsize Enterprise25%
Large Enterprise53%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business20%
Midsize Enterprise24%
Large Enterprise56%
REVIEWERS
Small Business31%
Midsize Enterprise18%
Large Enterprise51%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business13%
Midsize Enterprise26%
Large Enterprise62%
REVIEWERS
Small Business10%
Midsize Enterprise30%
Large Enterprise60%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business2%
Midsize Enterprise9%
Large Enterprise89%
Find out what your peers are saying about Checkmarx vs. Coverity and other solutions. Updated: January 2021.
456,495 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Checkmarx is ranked 3rd in Application Security with 18 reviews while Coverity is ranked 11th in Application Security with 8 reviews. Checkmarx is rated 8.0, while Coverity is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Checkmarx writes "Works well with Windows servers but no Linux support and takes too long to scan files". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Coverity writes "Straightforward to install and reports few false positives, but it should be easier to specify your own validation and sanitation routines". Checkmarx is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, HCL AppScan, WhiteSource and Snyk, whereas Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Micro Focus Fortify on Demand, Klocwork, Fortify Application Defender and Polyspace Code Prover. See our Checkmarx vs. Coverity report.

See our list of best Application Security vendors.

We monitor all Application Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.