We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"The most valuable feature of Checkmarx is the user interface, it is very easy to use. We do not need to configure anything, we only have to scan to see the results."
"Compared to the solutions we used previously, Checkmarx has reduced our workload by almost 75%."
"The only thing I like is that Checkmarx does not need to compile."
"The best thing about Checkmarx is the amount of vulnerabilities that it can find compared to other free tools."
"The most valuable features of Checkmarx are difficult to pinpoint because of the way the functionalities and the features are intertwined, it's difficult to say which part of them I prefer most. You initiate the scan, you have a scan, you have the review set, and reporting, they all work together as one whole process. It's not like accounting software, where you have the different features, et cetera."
"The solution communicates where to fix the issue for the purpose of less iterations."
"The UI is very intuitive and simple to use."
"The simplicity of the solution and its ability to integrate easily with others are its most valuable aspects."
"Load balancing and web application firewall features are the most valuable."
"It does an excellent job of load balancing."
"WAF feature replicates the firewall."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The pricing is quite good."
"I find Application Gateway’s WAF module valuable because it helps prevent layer 7 attacks."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is its ease of use."
"The product's reporting feature could be better. The feature works well for developers, but reports generated to be shared with external parties are poor, it lacks the details one gets when viewing the results directly from the Checkmarx One platform."
"Micro-services need to be included in the next release."
"Integration into the SDLC (i.e. support for last version of SonarQube) could be added."
"The integration could improve by including, for example, DevSecOps."
"One area for improvement in Checkmarx is pricing, as it's more expensive than other products."
"It provides us with quite a handful of false positive issues. If Checkmarx could reduce this number, it would be a great tool to use."
"You can't use it in the continuous delivery pipeline because the scanning takes too much time."
"They could work to improve the user interface. Right now, it really is lacking."
"The solution doesn’t support wildcard-based and regular expression-based rules."
"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."
"Application Gateway’s limitation is that the private and the public endpoint cannot use the same port."
"The product could be easier to use and implement."
"It could be more stable, and support could be better. It would also be better if they offered more features. For example, it lacks security features. Before we used another English solution, and we realized that some of the rules were not set up correctly and passed through the Application Gateway's English controllers. But the problem, in this case, is if you send ten rules, for example, six rules hit some issues. IP address blocking could be better. The rules, for example, don't work properly. If you have one issue, one rule or another rule will not work. This sounds like total madness to me."
"In the next release, the solution could improve the integration with Service Mesh and other Azure Security Services."
"Microsoft Azure Application Gateway's first deployment is complex. It needs to improve its pricing."
"The graphical interface needs improvement because it is not user friendly."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 38 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with Azure Front Door, Citrix NetScaler, F5 Advanced WAF, AWS WAF and Cloudflare Web Application Firewall.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
