We performed a comparison between Cisco Cloud Services Router and Netgate TNSR based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MikroTik, Cisco, Juniper and others in Routers."The most valuable feature is the SNMP traps that I use to monitor the router and the availability of the network."
"It connects all the accounts with the weaknesses, and this is what we were looking for. Also, it connects with the on-premise side."
"The routing service for NPLS called Layer 3-IP is fantastic."
"The most important feature is that it is designed for mobile vehicle communication in harsh conditions."
"It is definitely scalable. It can handle a lot more traffic and group work compared to any other products that I've evaluated. It could easily scale a lot more than what I'm doing right now."
"AWS has a reference architecture to enable the Cisco routers in high availability and Transit VPC. This is a very powerful router and can enable us to use Transit VPC in AWS, and this is a very powerful feature that we use."
"What's best about Cisco Cloud Services Router is the support. It's excellent, and so far, no significant challenges. Another valuable feature of the product is easy integration with other products."
"It seems pretty stable. We have never had any issues with it."
"The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"I would like some deployment examples and guides specific to AWS VPCs and how to separate your subnets. Then, how they tie-in with the Internet gateway and any NAT services that we are running on our VPC. This would be extremely helpful."
"You can use this router in a scalable solution but it has its limitations."
"I would like to see better security, where there are more access controls and data confidentiality."
"If you lose connectivity to the cloud, it is difficult to establish connectivity between hub and spoke."
"The configuration is difficult."
"Technical support could be better. I am missing a single pane of glass, where I can see all the connections, etc."
"It does the job, but it's not cloud native. It could be even better, like having a single pane of glass and being less expensive."
"There should be a system in place to help existing users make an easier transition to the newer interfaces."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
Cisco Cloud Services Router is ranked 6th in Routers with 17 reviews while Netgate TNSR is ranked 8th in Routers with 2 reviews. Cisco Cloud Services Router is rated 8.0, while Netgate TNSR is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cisco Cloud Services Router writes "Useful for smooth migrations, high availability, and simple deployment". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netgate TNSR writes "Good gateway with helpful traffic shaping and load balancing". Cisco Cloud Services Router is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and Huawei Enterprise Routers, whereas Netgate TNSR is most compared with MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, Cisco Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches and Juniper MX Series Routers.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.