Most Helpful Review
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
The UCS, which is by far the best management tool there is on the market, regardless of vendor. It's the only tool I see that gives you the opportunity to size and scale all the assets and capacity you have in your data center, from a unified view.
Cisco provides the ability to configure BIOS, something that no one else can do, on a remote basis. That's really helpful sometimes. The bus-snooping alteration tool for BIOS is fantastic. That's one of the game-changing features that Cisco alone has at this point.
The feature that we are most interested in is the scalability. When needed, we are able to add more nodes and scale it up further.
The most valuable feature was the backup - it was easy to back up. It was also very easy to administrate and manage the system; much easier and faster. Finally, it was easy to extend the disk capacities.
I love the Cisco design, the visual interface to manage and use the platform.
There are some slight cost advantages when you need fewer resources to manage it.
This is not the only product we use, so we have other solutions to compare it with. We can compare different products and different vendors and tell our customers which products have which advantages and disadvantages so that they can leverage these products in their own environment. This product helps us to understand the customer's needs and what issues they can run into.
Most of our users are Cisco customers, so it fits in within the suites we use. Primarily for me, as a solution architect, it's the technology and architecture that is the most valuable. I know from my technical colleagues that it's easy to use and for the customer, the up-time is the most valuable asset. It's running, has low failure, and so on which is why we use it.
There is no in-depth config involved nor third-party needed, saving us time and money.
This product has given us clear visibility into what we need technology-wise to grow.
RecoverPoint give us peace of mind knowing any corruption or server issue can be rectified very quickly, making sure the business impact is minimal.
There is a single vendor with the hardware, software, and maintenance. Thus, there is a single vendor with whom we can contact.
It is scalable. When you are buying it, you have to buy a minimum of three nodes. After that, if you want to add more nodes, you can buy can buy them. You can also add-on additional compute and storage.
The technical support is very helpful and answers questions whenever we have issues with the product.
Its ease of administration is extremely valuable. It allows me to make better use of my time for other tasks instead of maintaining systems through multiple administration consoles.
It makes for easier deployments through automation and improved accessibility.
I would like it to be easier to manage the server, create VMs, and manage the VMs on the client.
I would have liked it to be able to back up the system to a cloud, to be able to work from any other place
Cisco has to continue improve the management tools to provide a better command line interface with more functions. That would be better for administration.
It needs improvements in terms of I/O. Sometimes I have felt it is slightly slow while we are trying to provision VMs or access VMs.
The primary improvements should be made in the cluster storage controller VMs so that they don't break the upgrade process.
We are moving further out with more cloud solutions, so we need HyperFlex to be more cloud-connected. They should develop more connection to Amazon Web Services and Google cloud because our customers use their services and are moving in that direction.
They should have more blade options and more configuration flexibility. Also, the price is expensive. It should be cheaper but it is worth the price.
Their technical support is very bad. We had an issue where instead of an engineer we got a PDF "doctor" that didn't know anything about our problem which was very frustrating.
The initial setup between the different Dell departments is fragmented. The engineers who come to rack/stack and do the initial config should be trained on all the areas and work with the different Dell departments whilst they are onsite to give a smoother install and better experience for customer.
At present, VxRail is a hyperconverged state of the art product being installed in a legacy way. We need hyperconverged install teams.
They should add automation and activation going forward.
Next release, we would like to see online applications.
It needs faster deployment of security patches.
We spend around six months waiting for a confirmation and firmware upgrade to confirm this step.
My main issue so far is that the installation created a default datacenter name of "Marvin" and it cannot be changed.
Pricing and Cost Advice
They are not the cheapest on the market. But there's an old saying I like to quote: "If you know that you are getting what you pay for, it's fine if it's expensive."
Initially HyperFlex was a little costly, it was higher, but Cisco wanted to get into our company, so they gave us a fair discount.
It's much more expensive than rack servers. It was an issue, but when you compare it to the number of people who were administrative assistants before, it's on the positive ROI side. It's much cheaper.
Here in Brazil... it is very expensive. It's very hard for almost all companies to buy even the small version of this solution.
We negotiated with Cisco and we got some price benefit from that.
The price is a bit too high.
The product is expensive. Other solutions are cheaper.
The cost is expensive, but there is a chance to save money in the future.
Compare it to what you spent on your last solution.
Compare the VxRail product to Nutanix. Nutanix has more features, but its pricing is higher.
Be mindful of your storage needs now and for the future.
Most of hyper-converged solutions require additional licenses for the virtualization layer (like VMware).
There is a permanent vSAN license included since it is required, but vCenter\ESXi host licensing should be validated in the purchase process.
out of 37 in Hyper-Converged (HCI)
Average Words per Review
out of 37 in Hyper-Converged (HCI)
Average Words per Review
Compared 33% of the time.
Compared 26% of the time.
Compared 15% of the time.
Compared 35% of the time.
Compared 19% of the time.
Compared 12% of the time.
Also Known As
The Cisco HyperFlex HX Data Platform is a purpose-built, high-performance, scale-out file system with a wide array of enterprise-class data management services. The data platform’s innovations redefine distributed storage technology, giving you complete hyper-convergence with enterprise storage features:
VxRail is the only fully integrated, preconfigured, and pre-tested VMware hyper-converged infrastructure appliance family on the market. Based on VMware’s vSphere and Virtual SAN, and EMC software, VxRail delivers an all-in-one IT infrastructure transformation by leveraging a known and proven building block for the Software Defined Data Center (SDDC).
With the power of a whole SAN in just two rack units, they provide a simple, cost effective hyper-converged solution for a wide variety of applications and workloads. VxRail Appliances deliver resiliency, QoS, and centralized management functionality enabling faster, better, and simpler management of consolidated workloads, virtual desktops, business-critical applications, and remote office infrastructure.
Learn more about Cisco HyperFlex HX-Series
Learn more about VxRail
|BluePearl Veterinary Partners, Ready Pac Foods, Bryant University, Bellevue Group, KPIT Technologies, City Harvest||World Wide Technology Inc, Renault Sport Formula One Team, 8x8 Inc, Brownes, Canadian Pacific, Canopy, Denton, EDF, Unilin, Xerox|
Comms Service Provider24%
Financial Services Firm12%
Financial Services Firm19%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm14%