We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Forescout and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."For my use cases, the in-depth troubleshooting into why a client can't connect or why they failed, is very valuable. I can go back to someone and say, 'Hey, it's not my network. It's their certificates or user error,' or something else."
"Cisco ISE integrates with everything else."
"I love the policy sets, they are really nice and dynamic."
"The most valuable features are the ability to retrieve information about Active Directory user names, viewing the log files to see which MAC address tried to connect with the created SSIDs, portal designing for your company, hotspot tools, and creating network rules for WiFi access."
"The profiling model included is the most valuable feature."
"The live logs and live sessions for troubleshooting are the most valuable features because they provide a detailed report of any issues."
"The user experience of the solution is great. It's a very transparent system."
"In terms of scalability, you need to factor in your licenses. With a virtual platform, the scalability is more than sufficient. We have over one thousand users."
"It's more of a risk reduction. It takes passwords that are not being managed properly and manages them automatically which really reduces risk."
"I would like to see the product simplified more, especially with the configuration."
"The templates could be better. When you have to do certs, especially with X.500 certs, it isn't very intuitive."
"The UI is not as intuitive as some other products, even products inside of Cisco's wheelhouse."
"There is room for improvement in CLI. Most things are done through the GUI, and there aren't many commands or troubleshooting options available compared to other Cisco products like switches and routers."
"Difficult to figure out the protocols and nodes in order to implement correctly."
"Cisco ISE is complex. The deployment and design of networks with it is so complex. If it could change it would be better."
"The initial setup was a little bit complex. It's not that simple because it requires a lot of prerequisites for the solution to get a hold on."
"ISE is a little clunky. The front-end feels like it is from the 1980s."
"They should improve the application password management. The capability to manage high availability application passwords is its biggest shortcoming."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 135 reviews while Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC). Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] writes "It’s greatest ability is that it can easily randomize all local accounts on almost any endpoint". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Leiberman RED Identity Management [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.