We performed a comparison between Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] and Sophos Network Access Control based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC).More Sophos Network Access Control Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Network Access Control (NAC) while Sophos Network Access Control is ranked 7th in Network Access Control (NAC) with 18 reviews. Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Sophos Network Access Control is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] writes "Helps by tracking port VLAN configurations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sophos Network Access Control writes "An affordable solution that provides web protection, URL filtering, and application filtering". Cisco NAC Manager and Server [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Sophos Network Access Control is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform and F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM).
See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.