We performed a comparison between Cisco Nexus and Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Arista, Dell Technologies and others in Data Center Networking.
"We've found their tech support to be excellent, especially in their willingness to resolve issues promptly."
"We have continuity with Cisco, which provides a very high-end solution."
"This solution has allowed us to better prepare our network for 10-gigabit."
"The product has a stable and strong server panel switch."
"Cisco Nexus is very safe and stable. I've been here 8 months. We have some devices that have been out for 11 years."
"This solution provides all of the routing and searching features that we need."
"The most valuable features are extensions and recorded scalability."
"It provides a very flexible connection to a server. When you go into history and the VPC, it provides a very flexible connection from it. Once a server goes down I can instruct it easily. So the network actually keeps quality even if onsite it is down."
"Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment's most valuable feature is that the data is easy to set up and control. We can manage everything from the cloud and it has been good for our clients."
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Pros →
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. The solution is expensive. Compared to other vendors, it's costly for similar products."
"We lag on the configuration. The changes make a difference in troubleshooting."
"As a device meant to lead the processes related to networking and troubleshooting, I feel both aspects can be described as areas with certain concerns where improvements are required."
"Technical support could be better."
"It would be ideal if there was better integration with various other platforms."
"Areas in which the solution have room for improvement are the interface, management, and reporting."
"In the next release of the solution, I would like to see varying integration between VRF (Virtual Routing and Forwarding) instances so we can integrate BGB into different VRFs in a more organized way. We have some issues with tunnels and VRFs."
"We have encountered some software bugs."
"The security in Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment could improve in the future."
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Cons →
More Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Nexus is ranked 3rd in Data Center Networking with 101 reviews while Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Data Center Networking. Cisco Nexus is rated 8.4, while Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Nexus writes " Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] writes "Simple data manipulation, straightforward initial setup, and low maintenance". Cisco Nexus is most compared with Cisco Catalyst Switches, Juniper QFX Series Switches, Arista Networks Platform, Dell PowerConnect Switches and VMware NSX, whereas Enterasys Data Center Networking Equipment [EOL] is most compared with .
See our list of best Data Center Networking vendors.
We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
