We performed a comparison between Cisco Prime and Juniper Mist Wired Assurance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Management Applications solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cisco Prime can help customers fix their Wi-Fi issues with scientific and digital data."
"What I found most beneficial from Cisco Prime is that it gives you an insight into what your network does, even when you're not actively monitoring what's going on with your network."
"The technical support team is very good."
"The most valuable is the assistance for network support."
"Enables oversight in order to tweak and tune."
"The dashboard is a valuable feature. It's very clear, and the metrics make it easy to see the current network situation."
"We use the solution to control the physical service station that is part of the SCADA network. We connect and control them remotely."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Prime is its excellent audio and video conferencing with clear quality and no interruptions."
"The most valuable feature of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is zero-touch provisioning for query edge switches. You can connect the switch directly to your edge locations and then directly onboard, similar to the Cisco Meraki solutions."
"The product greatly improved our organization in terms of making configuration, deployment, and firmware upgrades easy for multiple automated devices."
"The solution can be slow at times."
"They could consider offering more flexible pricing options for their customers."
"I would love for Cisco Prime to show bandwidth usage and consumption, but I can't monitor bandwidth usage at a given time."
"The reporting feature of Cisco Prime should be improved."
"Lacking in integration with a SIEM tool."
"I rate Cisco Prime seven out of 10 for affordability. All Cisco solutions are expensive."
"This solution could be improved if it could monitor configuration changes."
"The product needs to improve its interface and reporting."
"The configuration aspect of the solutions is relatively new, but I have had positive experiences. However, for more advanced tasks, such as VXLANs on the EX platform, Juniper Mist Wired Assurance may not be the best option due to certain limitations. Nonetheless, it does have a CLI override feature for specialized configurations that cannot be done through the GUI."
"The platform’s monitoring tool is not up to the mark. It is not proactive enough and lacks some capabilities. Additionally, they should work on providing integration with other vendors."
Cisco Prime is ranked 2nd in Network Management Applications with 35 reviews while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is ranked 15th in Network Management Applications with 2 reviews. Cisco Prime is rated 7.8, while Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Prime writes "Robust, cost-effective, and provides good visibility, but the scalability could improve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper Mist Wired Assurance writes "Simple installation, helpful zero-touch provisioning , and quick support". Cisco Prime is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, SolarWinds Network Configuration Manager, Aruba Airwave, Huawei eSight and ManageEngine Network Configuration Management, whereas Juniper Mist Wired Assurance is most compared with Cisco DNA Center, Junos Space Network Director, ExtremeCloud IQ, Aruba Airwave and HPE Intelligent Management Center. See our Cisco Prime vs. Juniper Mist Wired Assurance report.
See our list of best Network Management Applications vendors.
We monitor all Network Management Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.