Compare Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS vs. Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Use Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS? Share your opinion.
Use Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway? Share your opinion.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: April 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The core business of Cisco Umbrella is non-malware. That's all it does: block the malware on the gateway.""The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability.""Using this solution has meant that we've needed to make fewer firewall changes.""The most valuable feature is that it secures our network against blacklisted or malicious websites.""The most valuable features are the protection against ransomware and phishing.""It will protect, give you more robustness, and faster responses, compared to any firewalls or any of the proxy web servers.""The most valuable feature for us is the DNS-based protection.""It analyzes the domain security helps us implement the securest policy."

More Cisco Umbrella Pros »

"The cyber security features they offer are most trusted"

More Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS Pros »

"It is for secure web trafficking, and it is doing what it needs to do. It allows customers to consolidate and eliminate multiple technologies onto Netskope and just kind of turn the dial and use more features, such as CASB, VPN. SWG is another feature. You can monitor and govern all the traffic.""We've found the solution to be quite stable."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Pros »

Cons
"The solution's technical support is not very good.""Security, overall, can always be improved.""I would like to see DLP integration in the next release of this solution.""Support for multiple domains is important to us.""I would like to see a graphical representation of the entire network.""It would be useful if they had a malware protection engine running inside their own VM.""This solution does not give us full, 360-degree protection.""I would like to see integration with SecurNX in the future."

More Cisco Umbrella Cons »

"Setup is not that difficult, but it really requires proper technical training."

More Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS Cons »

"Cost competitiveness is its area of improvement. They will have to figure out how can they strategically price it because there are a few players in the game who have been doing it for a long time. They will have to figure out how to go to market on the pricing.""The initial setup is a bit complex in that it takes a lot of time. In order to get the product to work as you need it to, there is a lot of configuration required."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"There is a one-time cost of approximately $800 USD per user, and then a yearly support fee of about $50 per user.""Our costs were negotiated, and they are okay.""Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis.""Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis.""Cisco has a model called ELA. With ELA, if you buy the solution you will have the complete security portfolio and you can pay it yearly or after three years, it depends on the contract.""I am not sure, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I think it's $1.00 or so per device/month.""Cisco uses subscription models for the pricing and there are three subscription plans.""The licensing part for Umbrella is really flexible."

More Cisco Umbrella Pricing and Cost Advice »

Information Not Available
"We pay a licensing fee of $10,000 on a yearly basis."

More Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Security Gateways solutions are best for your needs.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: Its simplicity is most valuable. I can install it and get it up and running, and it can be pervasive across my business… more »
Top Answer: It has a reasonable price. It is certainly not as expensive as it used to be. It is in line with other offerings on the… more »
Top Answer: The API is very Cisco orientated, which is absolutely fine if you're using Cisco Firepower and SecureX kind of products… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Top Answer: Netscope, Zscaler if they continue route they are on now. FIrewalls needs great deal of automation on each end… more »
Top Answer: Those firewalls that allow extend the perimeter. Nowadays, there is a issue with the static perimeter and all is going… more »
Top Answer: We've found the solution to be quite stable.
Popular Comparisons
Also Known As
OpenDNS
ScanSafe Web Security SaaS
Learn More
Overview

OpenDNS provides easy-to-implement Internet navigation and Web security solutions for families, schools, governmental organizations and businesses of all sizes. The services provided by OpenDNS increase the speed of navigating websites and prevent unintended access to phishing and malware sites as well as to any Web content that you configure to be restricted.   

Cisco ScanSafe is a cloud hosted web filtering service which enables you to create, enforce and monitor Web usage policies. Layering real time rule-based filters with up-to-date and accurate categorization database, Web Filtering enforces your organization's acceptable usage policy, protecting you from the legal liabilities of inappropriate content, reducing bandwidth congestion and improving employee productivity.

Netskope’s Next Generation SWG is a cloud-based web security solution that prevents malware, detects advanced threats, filters by category, protects data, and controls app use for any user, location, device. It unifies our industry-leading CASB, SWG, and DLP into common policy controls with custom reporting and rich metadata for ad-hoc queries.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Umbrella
Learn more about Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS
Learn more about Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway
Sample Customers
Chart Industries, City of Aspen, Eastern Mountain Sports, FLEXcon, George Washington University, Jackson Municipal Airport Authority, Ohio Public Library Information Network, PTC, Richland Community College, Smart Motors, Tulane University, VeriClaim
Arup Group, Gobierno de Castilla-La Mancha, K&L Gates, New South Wales Rural Fire Service, Transplace
Arrow, Cloudrise, Sainsbury, Evalueserve, Stroock, Apria, Ather Energy, CSA, AVX Corporation Nuna, City of San Diego Case, Genomic Health Case Study, Oak Hill Advisors, MaRS Discovery District.
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm16%
Consumer Goods Company10%
Comms Service Provider10%
Educational Organization6%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Comms Service Provider29%
Computer Software Company24%
Financial Services Firm6%
Government5%
No Data Available
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company28%
Comms Service Provider19%
Energy/Utilities Company13%
Financial Services Firm9%
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business33%
Midsize Enterprise29%
Large Enterprise38%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business9%
Midsize Enterprise23%
Large Enterprise68%
No Data Available
No Data Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, Forcepoint and others in Web Security Gateways. Updated: April 2021.
501,818 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS is ranked 15th in Web Security Gateways with 1 review while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is ranked 11th in Web Security Gateways with 2 reviews. Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS is rated 7.0, while Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS writes "Good cyber security features; could simplify for users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway writes "Scalable with good technical support and very good data leak prevention". Cisco ScanSafe Web Security SaaS is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, whereas Netskope Next Gen Secure Web Gateway is most compared with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Menlo Web Security, Cato Networks, Fortinet FortiGate SWG and Trustwave Secure Web Gateway.

See our list of best Web Security Gateways vendors.

We monitor all Web Security Gateways reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.