We performed a comparison between Cisco IOS SSL VPN and Sangfor SSL VPN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two SSL VPN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"It is stable."
"The user interface is user-friendly."
"IOS is user-friendly and simple. You connect to a particular VPN, and that's it. You become seamless after that."
"The platform provides value and benefits to our organization through efficient and effective communication."
"Cisco certainly has a really strong support team."
"It's a very stable solution and I'd say it works perfectly."
"The feature I find most valuable, is the management portal."
"Stability-wise, it is a very good solution."
"The most valuable feature is our ability to limit access by user, IP address, or MAC address."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of the product is very easy."
"Sangfor SSL VPN is a secure and user-friendly solution."
"The platform is easy to use."
"Sangfor SSL VPN provides secure encryption for communication."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"The only issue with Cisco IOS SSL VPN is on the price point. Price is an area of the solution where improvements are required."
"Cisco device management is quite difficult. They should work to simplify this."
"It would be nice if we could use this not just on mobile, but on laptops and desktops as well."
"The servers should be more user-friendly."
"The product's RPA tools need enhancement for simplified business process automation."
"When many people are using the internet at home, which is usually right after dinner, this type of service is a little bit hard to use. The internet becomes quite slow, and sometimes, I have to stop using this application. I am not sure if this issue is because of the application or my internet provider."
"Multi-factor authentication in Cisco IOS SSL VPN has certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The performance could be improved."
"The technical support team takes around two months to respond to queries. It is very time-consuming."
"In redundancy mode, when the firewall goes off, the VPN should be able to connect to the secondary firewall automatically."
"Sangfor SSL VPN should provide advanced protection against ransomware and better data analysis."
"I think Sangfor can provide a web-based SSL VPN version."
"No solution is perfect, so there is room for improvement."
Cisco IOS SSL VPN is ranked 1st in SSL VPN with 47 reviews while Sangfor SSL VPN is ranked 7th in SSL VPN with 5 reviews. Cisco IOS SSL VPN is rated 8.6, while Sangfor SSL VPN is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco IOS SSL VPN writes "The solution is very stable and scalable, but it is expensive, and the configuration is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Sangfor SSL VPN writes "A secure and user-friendly solution that is simple to implement and configure". Cisco IOS SSL VPN is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Zyxel VPN Client, Ivanti Connect Secure and SonicWall Netextender, whereas Sangfor SSL VPN is most compared with Sangfor EasyConnect, Peplink SpeedFusion, OpenVPN Access Server and AWS Direct Connect. See our Cisco IOS SSL VPN vs. Sangfor SSL VPN report.
See our list of best SSL VPN vendors and best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.