We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and SafeBreach based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in Network Monitoring Software."We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Able to drill down into a center's utilization, then create reports based on it."
"The most valuable features provided by this solution are visibility and information."
"Overall, the implementation is very good."
"We find that Stealthwatch can detect the unseen."
"It provides good visibility to the customers. People are still evaluating it, but it provides visibility and helps them to take action to remediate and mitigate the issues that are highlighted on the dashboard. It has good integration with the Cisco switching platform."
"It has improved our internal knowledge of what's going on with the network, and that's helpful."
"It has definitely helped us improve our mean time to resolution on network issues."
"There are already many functionalities, so I don't think there is anything to improve."
"The most valuable feature is the reporting database and attack protection."
"The most valuable feature is the huge library of hack attacks and breach methods."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"We've run into some issues with the configuration."
"We haven't seen ROI."
"At my company, we might not be using it enough with other applications that we have that can integrate with it."
"The initial setup was straightforward but required a lot of data entry, to begin with building out the server types and network types."
"If there was one improvement I’d suggest it would be that it detect traffic through an intranet. The product requires that traffic flow through a managed network device. The product is designed mostly for enterprise environments and not smaller environments or businesses."
"I would like to see better filters."
"I would like the search page available with Cisco Stealthwatch to be more intuitive. The previous release was better than the current one for the UI."
"Cisco could improve the administration for the customers."
"There is room for improvement in the interface. It is not always easy to find the options that you need and not everything is customizable."
"I would like to see some integration on the customization and customer support."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 24th in Network Monitoring Software with 57 reviews while SafeBreach is ranked 5th in Breach and Attack Simulation (BAS) with 2 reviews. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while SafeBreach is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SafeBreach writes "Breach and attach simulation solution used to test security tools with a valuable library of hacking data". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas SafeBreach is most compared with Picus Security, Cymulate, Pentera, AttackIQ and XM Cyber.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.