Compare Cisco Tetration vs. Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud

Cisco Tetration is ranked 3rd in Cloud Workload Security with 8 reviews while Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud is ranked 5th in Cloud Workload Security with 1 review. Cisco Tetration is rated 8.6, while Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Tetration writes "Saves time, resists attacks, and allocates resources properly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud writes "Ensures compliance and keeps us free of bad actors". Cisco Tetration is most compared with VMware NSX, Illumio Adaptive Security Platform and GuardiCore, whereas Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud is most compared with Dome9, Evident and Threat Stack.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point, Threat Stack, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: November 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage. The telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent. It's complete. You see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network.The most valuable feature of this solution is security.The product offers great visibility into the network so we can enforce security measures.The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don't have to do packet captures on the network.A complete and powerful micro-segmentation solution.Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time.Scalability is its most valuable feature.By using Tetration insight, we are able to get the latency on our level accounts and we can determine whatever the issue is with the application latency itself.

Read more »

The most valuable feature is that the rule set is managed and that it can be run on a regularly scheduled basis.

Read more »

Cons
The multi-tenancy, redundancy, backup and restore functionalities, as well as the monitoring aspects of the solution, need improvement. The solution offers virtually no enterprise-grade possibility for monitoring.The interface is really helpful for technical people, but it is not user-friendly.The emailed notifications are either hard to find or they are not available. Search capabilities can be improved.I'd like to see better documentation for advanced features. The documentation is fairly basic. I would also like to see better integration with other applications.It has an uninviting interface.They should scale down the hardware a bit. The initial hardware investment is two million dollars so it's a price point problem. The issue with the price comes from the fact that you have to have it with enormous storage and enormous computes.It is not so easy to use and configure. It needs a bunch of further resources to work, which is mainly the biggest downside of it. The deployment is huge.It is highly scalable, but there is a limitation that it is only available on Cisco devices.

Read more »

The pricing for the solution needs improvement.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
It is not cheap and pricing may limit scalability.Pricing depends on the scope of the application and the features. Larger installations save more.The price is outrageous. If you have money to throw at the product, then do it.The pricing is a bit higher than we anticipated.

Read more »

Our licensing fees are $18,000 USD per year.

Read more »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Workload Security solutions are best for your needs.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
3rd
Views
4,943
Comparisons
3,198
Reviews
7
Average Words per Review
456
Avg. Rating
8.6
5th
Views
5,922
Comparisons
4,522
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
446
Avg. Rating
9.0
Top Comparisons
Compared 34% of the time.
Compared 25% of the time.
Also Known As
Prisma Public Cloud, RedLock Cloud 360, RedLock
Learn
Cisco
Palo Alto Networks
Video Not Available
Overview

Cisco Tetration offers holistic workload protection for multicloud data centers by enabling a zero-trust model using segmentation. This approach allows you to identify security incidents faster, contain lateral movement and reduce your attack surface. Its infrastructure-agnostic approach supports both on-premises and public cloud workloads.

The ability to quickly build and deploy global-scale applications has lead to the rapid adoption of public cloud infrastructure. Managing security at this scale hasn't kept up. Compounded by the accelerated development pace where DevOps teams sometimes push new releases into production daily, it’s no surprise security teams find themselves overwhelmed with lack of visibility, context and control despite the robust toolkits and capabilities offered by cloud service providers. Prisma Public Cloud redefines effective security and compliance management for today’s multi-cloud era.

Offer
Learn more about Cisco Tetration
Learn more about Palo Alto Networks Prisma Public Cloud
Sample Customers
ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)Amgen, Genpact, Western Asset, Zipongo, Proofpoint, NerdWallet, Axfood, 21st Century Fox, Veeva Systems, Reinsurance Group of America
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company29%
Comms Service Provider21%
Government7%
Retailer5%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Software R&D Company28%
Comms Service Provider16%
Financial Services Firm13%
Media Company8%
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point, Threat Stack, Cisco and others in Cloud Workload Security. Updated: November 2019.
378,809 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Cloud Workload Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Sign Up with Email