• Home
  • Citrix Gateway vs. Microsoft UAG [EOL]

Citrix Gateway vs Microsoft UAG [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Citrix Logo

Citrix Gateway

Read 33 Citrix Gateway reviews
1,158 views|809 comparisons
90% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo

Microsoft UAG [EOL]

Read 7 Microsoft UAG [EOL] reviews
views| comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
SSL VPN
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Citrix Gateway and Microsoft UAG [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN.
To learn more, read our detailed SSL VPN Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Suman Gautam
Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic
During the pandemic, many people were unable to go to the office. Citrix Gateway enabled them to work from home and access the office network.
Anonymous User
Microsoft RAS and UAG
Employees can work from home, branch offices or anywhere in the world together with employees in the firm.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Usually with Citrix the issue is the pricing, especially for the African region. We believe it's really expensive."
  • "Pricing is very high if you do a comparison with what is available in the market."
  • "I believe the pricing is comparable to SaaS"
  • "It costs about 4,000 a year."
  • "The price could be lower."
  • "There is a license to use Citrix Gateway and it is less expensive to use when compared to other solutions."
  • "There are two or three different models, but you can actually have a CapEx where you purchase the unit outright and then there's a yearly maintenance cost on top for years two and three, and four, or you can actually do a subscription purchase through Citrix cloud and you pay on a monthly basis, or you can have a three-year subscription contract as well. I give the solution a six out of ten for its cost."
  • "The solution has a yearly licensing fee."

    • More Citrix Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL VPN solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Citrix Gateway?
    Top Answer:We can maintain our systems using the solution.
    Read all 26 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Citrix Gateway?
    Top Answer:Compared to other products, WAF is more costlier than LB, but in Citrix, LB is more expensive than WAF. We have a yearly subscription. You may get a discount if you go for three years. There is an… more »
    Read all 12 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Citrix Gateway?
    Top Answer:The initial setup could be made easier.
    Read all 27 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    2nd
    out of 14 in SSL VPN
    Views
    1,158
    Comparisons
    809
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    319
    Rating
    7.9
    Unranked
    In SSL VPN
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Citrix NetScaler Unified Gateway
    UAG, MS UAG [EOL]
    Learn More
    Citrix
    Microsoft
    Overview

    Citrix Gateway is a customer-managed solution that can be deployed on premises or on any public cloud, such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud Platform. Citrix Gateway provides users with secure access and single sign-on to all the virtual, SaaS and web applications they need to be productive.


    Forefront Unified Access Gateway (UAG) provides remote client endpoints with access to corporate applications, networks, and internal resources via a Web portal or site. Forefront UAG product documentation is organized into content categories. Use the topics in each category to help you design, plan, deploy, and administer your Forefront UAG servers.
    Sample Customers
    Aeronamic, Avianca, Bechtel Corporation, Betfair UK, Catholic University Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Centene Corporation, Cerner, Charityshare, City of High Point, Clark Builders
    Topocart, AAG, GeoAir, Blue Skies Consulting, Hiparc Geotecnologia, Peace Map
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Comms Service Provider18%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization44%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Government5%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business38%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise38%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise50%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise43%
    Buyer's Guide
    SSL VPN
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Citrix, Ivanti and others in SSL VPN. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Citrix Gateway is ranked 2nd in SSL VPN with 33 reviews while Microsoft UAG [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in SSL VPN. Citrix Gateway is rated 8.2, while Microsoft UAG [EOL] is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Citrix Gateway writes "Provided the ability for remote work during the pandemic". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft UAG [EOL] writes "Microsoft RAS and UAG". Citrix Gateway is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager (APM), Fortinet FortiClient, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, Ivanti Connect Secure and Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client, whereas Microsoft UAG [EOL] is most compared with .

    See our list of best SSL VPN vendors.

    We monitor all SSL VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.