We performed a comparison between Cloudflare DDoS and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cloudflare is by far the most effective solution that I have come across."
"Cloudflare is simple to use."
"It will take the blow rather than our applications should an attack occur."
"It is a stable solution."
"Cloudflare DDoS mitigates DDoS attacks."
"This solution is easy to understand and easy to configure."
"Cloudflare DDoS is better than its competitors for its security, deployment, and scalability."
"The capabilities of the software are strong enough for me to do what it's supposed to do. For me, we don't need to do a lot of configuration on our site. We just enable it and monitor it."
"The reporting is very good and provides us with a comprehensive description of where attacks are emanating from."
"A valuable feature is the speed of signature updates."
"The product is very effective and performs well on devices."
"Technologically simple and effective."
"Radware DefensePro is one of the best solutions for on-premise protection."
"The product integrates well with Cisco."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"The free plan has limitations. For example, I can only set up three rules, and the application firewall is unavailable."
"The onboarding process can be improved a little bit."
"The tool should provide on-premise versions. Currently, all versions are cloud-based."
"Operating and tuning the product is difficult."
"Lacks a VPN feature to provide a secure connection to the data center."
"Cloudflare DDoS has poor technical support."
"The software has automated alerts, but the automated alerts are not available in the mobile app."
"The initial onboarding was causing us some confusion."
"I would like to see more graphics within the dashboard. Right now, you are required to buy tools in order to have graphical representation for your monitoring."
"The dashboard could be updated."
"The solution is a little more pricey than other options on the market."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
"The inability to access local technical support during our business hours poses a significant inconvenience."
"I would like to have more granular steps according to protected bandwidth, so the granularity should be better."
"I had some trouble in the registration account prior to deployment, but it was fixed. They were not very fast or responsive, however. It took about one week to resolve the issue."
"APSolute Vision needs to be more granular so that it's possible to get real-time information."
Cloudflare DDoS is ranked 4th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 12 reviews while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 21 reviews. Cloudflare DDoS is rated 8.6, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cloudflare DDoS writes "Perfect from my perspective; simple, user-friendly and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". Cloudflare DDoS is most compared with AWS Shield, Prolexic, StormWall Website Anti-DDoS Protection, Arbor DDoS and Nexusguard DDoS Protection, whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and Radware DefenseFlow. See our Cloudflare DDoS vs. Radware DefensePro report.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.