We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."This solution can be useful for tracking the different stages of projects and the people working on them."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"Low code development."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"I would like them to offer a one-time payment plan that one can choose."
"The OpenAPI is good, but it is not enough. It lacks out-of-box integrations with popular web services."
"There are not very many report templates, and if there were more, it would really help."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The initial setup seemed a bit complex, and there is no great documentation."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.