We performed a comparison between Commvault Cloud and OpenText InfoArchive based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Veritas, Commvault, Microsoft and others in File Archiving."A very stable and scalable platform (you can backup/restore/protect a couple of MBs or hundred of TBs as well from the same console/platform)."
"The most valuable feature of Commvault HyperScale X is the automatic nature of its operation. We don't need to worry about sets of documents. It worked automatically, we don't need to think about it. When you set the solution up in a good way, you don't need to worry."
"IntelliSnap for snapshot collection is one of the most efficient and easiest ways to back up large amounts of data."
"The solution provides us with a single platform to move, manage, and recover our data across on-premise locations. Some of the guys have been using it to move a virtual machine from VMware to the Microsoft solution, Hyper-V. They back it up and then they restore to the different virtual machine provider, and that works great."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to backup over the dedicated Fiber Channel directly from SAN."
"The return points are very valuable."
"We use the solution for cloud and data backup."
"The Commvault Complete Data Protection interface is straightforward to use."
"It has a strong XML engine for reading data and making it indexed and searchable."
"Command Center definitely gives us a complete view of our data. But finding some of the granular, very small items that we sometimes have to find, such as auxiliary copies for tapes, I still find that it's easier to navigate and, sometimes, only possible to find them using the CommCell tool."
"The back of virtual machines needs improvement. I know they're working on it. They're always doing new things but I think they still have a little bit more to do."
"Our main pain point is that some of our hardware is old. For example, the SSD disks for our application database are slow. It's hard to avoid a slowdown in our environment because the size of our backups is growing every year. If you're growing and don't upgrade the environment, you will see slower backups and restores. You must enhance the environment if you are growing."
"I would like Commvault to have a feature for cybersecurity threats, e.g. securing the target backup repository. Commvault just started testing and releasing this feature, but it needs to be stabilized."
"The product's migration process and stability need improvement."
"The solution's breadth and depth of cloud support are good, but could be better. Some cloud features that are common-sense, especially on AWS, are not completely integrated yet in the product. They are a work-in-progress."
"We've run into some issues when attempting to restore very large numbers of files. Of course, that's more of a design issue."
"The initial setup was complicated."
"It requires a decent amount of XL mapping."
Commvault Cloud is ranked 2nd in File Archiving with 104 reviews while OpenText InfoArchive is ranked 4th in File Archiving with 1 review. Commvault Cloud is rated 8.6, while OpenText InfoArchive is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Commvault Cloud writes "Provides excellent visibility and helps reduce costs and time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText InfoArchive writes "A solution that helps us sunset applications and manages data". Commvault Cloud is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Veeam Backup for Microsoft 365, Azure Backup and Cohesity DataProtect, whereas OpenText InfoArchive is most compared with IBM Integrated Archive Platform.
See our list of best File Archiving vendors.
We monitor all File Archiving reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
