Concourse for VMware Tanzu vs Jenkins vs Wercker comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
VMware Logo
594 views|566 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,756 views|5,825 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Oracle Logo
92 views|46 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Concourse for VMware Tanzu, Jenkins, and Wercker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent."
  • More Concourse for VMware Tanzu Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis nowadays. The biggest difference upon initial inspection is that TeamCity is far more focused on validating individual commits rather than certain types of tests. Jenkins’ front page presents information that is simply not useful in a non-linear development environment, where people are often working in vastly different directions. How many of the previous tests passed/failed is not really salient information in this kind of situation. Running specific tests for individual commits on TeamCity is far more trivial in terms of interface complexity than Jenkins. TeamCity just involves clicking the ”…” button in the corner on any test type (although I wish it wasn’t so easy to click “Run” by accident). I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins out of the box. There’s a point at which you feel that if you have to scour the documentation to do anything remotely complex in an application, you’re dealing with a bad interface. One disappointing thing in both is that inter-branch merges improperly trigger e-mails to unrelated committers. I suppose it is fairly difficult to determine who to notify about failure in situations like these, though. It seems like TeamCity pulls up the… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We never experienced any problems with scalability.
    Top Answer:The solution is bundled in with Cloud Foundry so the pricing is not independent.
    Top Answer:The biggest gap for me was just that the solution is relatively tied to Cloud Foundry. If you have anything you need to… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    14th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    594
    Comparisons
    566
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    246
    Rating
    7.0
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,756
    Comparisons
    5,825
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    7.9
    33rd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    92
    Comparisons
    46
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Pivotal Concourse, Concourse for PCF, Concourse
    Learn More
    Overview

    Continuous integration for application developers:

    Concourse for VMware Tanzu is a CI/CD system remastered for teams that practice agile development and deliver frequently to one or many cloud platforms.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Wercker enables organisations and their development teams to achieve their CI/CD goals with microservices and Docker. This is brought to life through our container-centric and cloud native automation platform comprising of our local CLI, online SaaS solution and API.

    Sample Customers
    Verizon, Cerner, Zipcar, Avarteq
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Pivotal, Open Listings, Framer, Tablelist
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Government10%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise73%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,334 professionals have used our research since 2012.