We just raised a $30M Series A: Read our story

Compare Confluent vs. Informatica Data Integration Hub

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros
"The design of the product is extremely well built and it is highly configurable.""The most valuable feature that we are using is the data replication between the data centers allowing us to configure a disaster recovery or software. However, is it's not mandatory to use and because most of the features that we use are from Apache Kafka, such as end-to-end encryption. Internally, we can develop our own kind of product or service from Apache Kafka.""A person with a good IT background and HTML will not have any trouble with Confluent.""Kafka Connect framework is valuable for connecting to the various source systems where code doesn't need to be written.""Their tech support is amazing; they are very good, both on and off-site."

More Confluent Pros »

"Performance and flexibility-wise, they're very user-friendly."

More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pros »

Cons
"there is room for improvement in the visualization.""It could have more themes. They should also have more reporting-oriented plugins as well. It would be great to have free custom reports that can be dispatched directly from Jira.""It would help if the knowledge based documents in the support portal could be available for public use as well.""They should remove Zookeeper because of security issues.""In Confluent, there could be a few more VPN options."

More Confluent Cons »

"The initial setup was not very straightforward. Not complex, but not very simple either."

More Informatica Data Integration Hub Cons »

Pricing and Cost Advice
"Confluent is expensive, I would prefer, Apache Kafka over Confluent because of the high cost of maintenance.""You have to pay additional for one or two features."

More Confluent Pricing and Cost Advice »

"Comparatively, their prices are a little bit too high."

More Informatica Data Integration Hub Pricing and Cost Advice »

report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Questions from the Community
Top Answer: A person with a good IT background and HTML will not have any trouble with Confluent.
Top Answer: I don't directly handle the licensing. My license is given to me. Therefore, I don't know the terms of the licensing or the exact costs.
Top Answer: The beginner who doesn't know how to work on HTML will struggle as when you create spaces in the Confluent, if you want to have some meeting notes or anything else, you need to know HTML and which… more »
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
6th
out of 38 in Streaming Analytics
Views
7,876
Comparisons
7,303
Reviews
5
Average Words per Review
628
Rating
8.4
32nd
Views
2,520
Comparisons
2,008
Reviews
1
Average Words per Review
661
Rating
7.0
Comparisons
Also Known As
Informatica Integration Hub, Integration Hub
Learn More
Overview

Confluent Platform is the complete streaming platform for large-scale distributed environments. Unlike a traditional messaging system or stream processing API, Confluent Enterprise enables all of your interfaces to the world to be connected to and make decisions with all of your internal systems in real time.

Confluent and partner vendors offer tested and secure connectors for many popular data systems. Connectors make it quick and easy to start setting up reliable data pipelines.

Our connectors are all fully integrated with the platform, namely the schema registry.

Informatica Data Integration Hub empowers large organizations to embrace change and the opportunities of new applications and analytics systems, while managing storage in Hadoop as well as relational database and file store options. The centralized modern hubbased architecture is the foundation for agile and managed enterprise data integration. As the first to apply a publish/subscribe model to data integration linking big data, cloud, and traditional systems, Informatica delivers productivity and intelligent automation without compromising control.

Offer
Learn more about Confluent
Learn more about Informatica Data Integration Hub
Sample Customers
ING, Priceline.com, Nordea, Target, RBC, Tivo, Capital One, Chartboost
Humana, Rabobank, State of Washington
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company27%
Comms Service Provider17%
Financial Services Firm10%
Media Company10%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company38%
Comms Service Provider13%
Financial Services Firm7%
Government7%
Find out what your peers are saying about MuleSoft, Informatica, Denodo and others in Cloud Data Integration. Updated: November 2021.
554,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Confluent is ranked 6th in Streaming Analytics with 5 reviews while Informatica Data Integration Hub is ranked 32nd in Data Integration Tools with 1 review. Confluent is rated 8.4, while Informatica Data Integration Hub is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Confluent writes "Scalable, flexible, open source solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Data Integration Hub writes "A centralized repository for orchestrating and sharing data but performance can be a little slow". Confluent is most compared with Amazon MSK, Amazon Kinesis, AWS Glue and Lenses.io, whereas Informatica Data Integration Hub is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, AWS Database Migration Service, Palantir Foundry, Azure Data Factory and Mule Anypoint Platform.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.