Coverity vs Digital.ai Application Security comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Synopsys Logo
17,993 views|11,623 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Digital.ai Logo
343 views|246 comparisons
0% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Coverity and Digital.ai Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST).
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Testing (AST) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Arne Dormaels
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a scalable solution.""This solution is easy to use.""The security analysis features are the most valuable features of this solution.""It has the lowest false positives.""The product has deeper scanning capabilities.""I encountered a bug with Coverity, and I opened a ticket. Support provided me with a workaround. So it's working at the moment, or at least it seems to be.""The most valuable feature is that there were not a whole lot of false positives, at least on the codebases that I looked at.""The ability to scan code gives us details of existing and potential vulnerabilities. What really matters for us is to ensure that we are able to catch vulnerabilities ahead of time."

More Coverity Pros →

"I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security."

More Digital.ai Application Security Pros →

Cons
"We'd like it to be faster.""The solution's user interface and quality gate could be improved.""When I put my code into Coverity for scanning, the code information of the product is in the system. The solution could be improved by providing a SBOM, a software bill of material.""Some features are not performing well, like duplicate detection and switch case situations.""The tool needs to improve its reporting.""The level of vulnerability that this solution covers could be improved compared to other open source tools.""They could improve the usability. For example, how you set things up, even though it's straightforward, it could be still be easier.""Coverity could improve the ease of use. Sometimes things become difficult and you need to follow the guides from the website but the guides could be better."

More Coverity Cons →

"I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities."

More Digital.ai Application Security Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Coverity is quite expensive."
  • "The licensing fees are based on the number of lines of code."
  • "The price is competitive with other solutions."
  • "It is expensive."
  • "Coverity is very expensive."
  • "This is a pretty expensive solution. The overall value of the solution could be improved if the price was reduced. Licensing is done on an annual basis."
  • "The pricing is very reasonable compared to other platforms. It is based on a three year license."
  • "The pricing is on the expensive side, and we are paying for a couple of items."
  • More Coverity Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Testing (AST) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:We researched Coverity, but in the end, we chose SonarQube. SonarQube is a tool for reviewing code quality and security. It helps to guide our development teams during code reviews by providing… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has improved our code quality and security very well.
    Top Answer:I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security.
    Top Answer:I would like the tool to integrate AI and automation that is dedicated to detecting software vulnerabilities.
    Top Answer:I used the tool to prepare for the interview as a Business Developer. It helped me improve my understanding on software security.
    Ranking
    Views
    17,993
    Comparisons
    11,623
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    8.0
    Views
    343
    Comparisons
    246
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    155
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Synopsys Static Analysis
    Arxan Application Protection, Digital.ai Application Protection
    Learn More
    Overview

    Coverity gives you the speed, ease of use, accuracy, industry standards compliance, and scalability that you need to develop high-quality, secure applications. Coverity identifies critical software quality defects and security vulnerabilities in code as it’s written, early in the development process, when it’s least costly and easiest to fix. With the Code Sight integrated development environment (IDE) plugin, developers get accurate analysis in seconds in their IDE as they code. Precise actionable remediation advice and context-specific eLearning help your developers understand how to fix their prioritized issues quickly, without having to become security experts. 

    Coverity seamlessly integrates automated security testing into your CI/CD pipelines and supports your existing development tools and workflows. Choose where and how to do your development: on-premises or in the cloud with the Polaris Software Integrity Platform (SaaS), a highly scalable, cloud-based application security platform. Coverity supports 22 languages and over 70 frameworks and templates.

    Our proprietary protection capabilities shield apps from reverse engineering, tampering, API exploits, and other attacks that can put your business, your customers, and your bottom line at risk.

    Sample Customers
    MStar Semiconductor, Alcatel-Lucent
    Valencell
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Manufacturing Company38%
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider17%
    Retailer8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Manufacturing Company28%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Construction Company9%
    Government9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise69%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Security Testing (AST)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Testing (AST). Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Coverity is ranked 4th in Application Security Testing (AST) with 33 reviews while Digital.ai Application Security is ranked 36th in Application Security Tools with 1 review. Coverity is rated 7.8, while Digital.ai Application Security is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Coverity writes "Best SAST tool to check software quality issues". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Digital.ai Application Security writes "Helps to improve knowledge on software security ". Coverity is most compared with SonarQube, Klocwork, Fortify on Demand, Checkmarx One and Veracode, whereas Digital.ai Application Security is most compared with SonarQube, PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and Fortify Application Defender.

    We monitor all Application Security Testing (AST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.