CrowdStrike Falcon Pros and Cons

I like the overall reports of this solution. They are crisp, and to the point.

It has an extremely low footprint, so it has got minimum impact on the user end points in terms of CPU and memory usage.

This solution has made the lives of the IT staff much easier, compared to the previous one.

We are now able to find the root cause analysis on any threat. We can figure out where the issue came in versus just dealing with where it is at the moment.

Because it is security product and acts like an AIML smart product, not merely based on daily/weekly updates and signatures.

We have seen a reduction to the performance hit to our operating systems.

We are happy with CloudStrike's ease of use and touch notification.

The most valuable feature is its threat analysis.

Scalability is good. We have had no issues with it.

Enables us to understand what processes are running on the system, what registry keys have been enabled.

The automatic alert feature is the most important feature of the solution.

It is cloud-based, and this does make some weary of the data being held on the cloud. Privacy requirements must be taken into account.

The dashboard does not have the facility to export the reports in a PDF format, which I can quickly share with internal stakeholders.

I would like to see the machine learning feature enhanced.

As the company has grown, the technical support has felt less personal.

The GUI can use improvement, it's cloud-based so sometimes the interface can be a bit slow. The interface could use a little bit more speed.

Unfortunately, native applications are not supported.

We have had to open a case with the technical support to get some issues and bugs resolved.

I would like CrowdStrike to provide some correlation in the threat analysis, so we can visualize things better.

Whenever there is a feature release (upgrade) where we push to all the endpoints, it causes something to be blocked without us knowing.

The management of log aggregation is in need of improvement.