We performed a comparison between CrowdStrike Falcon and Uptycs based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SentinelOne, CrowdStrike, Palo Alto Networks and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR).
"We can use Defender to block and monitor for security purposes without needing multiple other products to do different tasks."
"In Microsoft 365 vendor products, monitoring and connectivity across all Microsoft and third-party connectors enable viewing of all activity within those environments."
"The best feature is threat hunting. There are a lot of other features I like, such as the alert mechanism. The chain alert mechanism has a huge impact. It combines all the alerts into one incident and automatically correlates them with AI."
"We also use Microsoft Sentinel, Defender for Cloud, Defender for Identity, and Microsoft Defender for Cloud Apps. They are all integrated and it was very easy to integrate them. In my experience with the integrations, it was just a click of a button and things were integrated. It's just a button."
"Microsoft Defender's most critical component is its CASB solution. It has many built-in policies that can improve your organization's cloud security posture. It's effective regardless of where your users are, which is critical because most users are working from home. It's cloud-based, so nothing is on-premise."
"Microsoft 365 Defender's most valuable feature is the ability to control the shadow IP."
"I like that it's stable. It's been stable for a long time, and Microsoft Defender has done a good job there."
"The product integrates security into one tool instead of having third-party security tools."
"The scalability is good."
"The malware protection is the most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon."
"It has an extremely low footprint, so it has got minimum impact on the user end points in terms of CPU and memory usage."
"Its integration capability is valuable. It integrates easily with any OS."
"It's given me a level of confidence that my network is secure."
"The anomaly detection is the most valuable feature."
"Scalability hasn't been an issue for us."
"The most valuable feature of CrowdStrike Falcon is crowdsourcing intelligence."
"They have multiple great features."
"In the beginning, it's difficult to navigate the system because it is quite large. Just trying to find your way and understand how the system works can be hard. After spending quite a lot of time searching it's a lot easier, but I wish it were a bit more user-friendly when you're trying to find things."
"There is definitely scope for improvement in the automation area. Because the solution is a SaaS platform, we don't have the overall ability to automate stuff.... There is no direct way to go ahead because it's a SaaS platform."
"At times, there may be delays in the execution of certain actions and their effects."
"It would be highly beneficial if CoPilot could identify anomalies within the network and notify the IT team."
"The user interface of Microsoft 365 Defender could improve. They could make it simpler."
"The onboarding and offboarding need improvement. I work with other vendors as well, and they have an option to add a device or remove a device from the portal, whereas with Microsoft 365 Defender, we need to do that manually. However, once you do that, everything can be controlled through the portal, but getting the device onboarded and offboarded is currently manual. If we have an option to simply remove a device from the portal or get a device added from the portal, it would be more convenient. The rest of the features are similar. This is the only area where I found it different from others. I would also like to be able to simply filter with a few of the queries that are already there."
"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."
"The interface could be improved. For example, if you want to do a phishing simulation for your employees, it can take a while to figure out what to do. The interface is a bit messy and could be updated. It isn't too bad, but doing some things can be a long process."
"Some of Falcon's features are a bit pricey."
"The management of log aggregation is in need of improvement."
"We can't do scanning audits or device blocking or application control."
"I would also like to see the endpoint firewall component produce some level of logging and feedback."
"The GUI can use improvement, it's cloud-based so sometimes the interface can be a bit slow. The interface could use a little bit more speed."
"The product could be more accurate in terms of performance."
"We'd like to see more integration capabilities."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"We end up facing a lot of issues after upgrades."
CrowdStrike Falcon is ranked 2nd in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 105 reviews while Uptycs is ranked 24th in Extended Detection and Response (XDR) with 1 review. CrowdStrike Falcon is rated 8.8, while Uptycs is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CrowdStrike Falcon writes "Easy to set up with good behavior-based analysis but needs a single-click recovery option". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Uptycs writes "Great features, good support, and lots of functionality". CrowdStrike Falcon is most compared with Darktrace, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Trend Vision One, whereas Uptycs is most compared with Aqua Cloud Security Platform, Wiz, Lacework, Orca Security and Tenable.io Container Security.
See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
