We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and CylancePROTECT based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We can do both server and endpoint protection."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The most valuable features of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager are password management, session management, onboarding rules, platform customization, and safety management."
"The solution's technical support is good."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is its high performance, it's the best identity security platform. The security is good. It's easy to showcase the feature and capabilities and compare it with other competitors. It competes well with other solutions. Additionally, it is a complete solution."
"The department management aspect of the solution is the most valuable aspect."
"The password rotation and the session recording are the most valuable features."
"It handles situations that the other threat management tools wouldn't find. It has worked well covering the weaker sides of the other products that we're integrating."
"You can manage all the threats and everything from a centralized dashboard."
"The solution’s AI is its most valuable feature."
"Blackberry Protect offers endpoint protection. It's easy to deploy. It's scalable and stable."
"Does malware analysis. Blocks WannaCry and other attacks that have come out."
"Two or three years ago when the WannaCry virus struck, the people that were on Cylance were the ones that weren't affected."
"It actively monitors the behavior and activity of processes and will, without hesitation, terminate at root anything it determines to be suspect."
"It provides good insight into the programs, applications, or websites that may need attention."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"It's an old product and has many areas that can be improved."
"The price of the solution should improve."
"Performance could be better. We have a couple of problems with CyberArk right now. One of the problems is performance in our environment. Support also takes a long time to respond. If the user already has local admin rights, then I can't collect any events in the console from this device. There are also some options in CyberArk that are not working properly, and are not helpful in this case. I can't collect any information to create a proper policy for the device. I have to investigate everything manually, or even disable the local admin from the device. I can collect the events only after this, and it's very time consuming. In my case, it's a waste of resources."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The tool should be more user-friendly."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"It is hard to deal with technical support if you are not certified."
"It should provide more details about the events that they have detected."
"It was not effective. There were a lot of false positives, even when we use Adobe, and everybody uses Adobe, which is not a threat."
"I would say one thing that they might need to bring in is protection for mobile devices."
"The product must make the interface a little more user-friendly."
"The process of whitelisting a script that you want to be able to run can be a little bit difficult, or awkward."
"It's a good solution but some features just need to be updated."
"The product needs to continue to offer better alerts. In particular, around false positives. It needs to reduce them from happening."
"The security scripting needs improvement. It needs deeper security for scripting."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while CylancePROTECT is ranked 27th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 39 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while CylancePROTECT is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of CylancePROTECT writes "Ensures advanced AI-driven threat detection to provide robust endpoint security, effectively preventing both known and unknown threats with minimal impact on system performance". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Tanium, whereas CylancePROTECT is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, SentinelOne Singularity Complete, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Trend Micro Deep Security. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. CylancePROTECT report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.