We performed a comparison between CyberArk Identity and PingAccess based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Auth0, Okta and others in Access Management."The most valuable features of CyberArk Identity are its ability to control access to administrative staff."
"The most valuable feature of CyberArk Identity is the adaptive interface."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It takes me up to an hour and a half."
"The tool helps with authentication. It acts as an MFA for any kind of privileged access that occurs in our organization."
"The initial setup of CyberArk Identity was straightforward."
"The solution helps with auditing, and monitoring, and integrates with Splunk for log analysis. User activity logs are captured in CyberArk Identity and sent to external tools like Splunk for analysis and monitoring."
"I like the RBAC (Role-Based Access Control). It basically involves defining various roles, and then simply assigning those roles to users."
"The integration capabilities, ability to integrate CyberArk into the overall IBB strategy of our current clients."
"The solution is highly stable and scalable"
"We would like to see an improvement in the ability to manage mobile devices."
"In terms of general user feedback, the more security you put in front of a user, the more they complain. So usability and the user experience are always a challenge. So there's always room for improvement."
"They could improve their UI and make everything more user-friendly."
"In terms of a governance platform, it's worth noting that CyberArk doesn't offer a particularly strong one."
"The solution's difficulty in gaining skill sets should be improved because it's a vertical product."
"CyberArk Identity's GUI is an area with certain shortcomings that need improvement."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The solution could be easier to use and I found it to be very complex involving many steps."
"The initial setup appears to be difficult in the beginning."
CyberArk Identity is ranked 8th in Access Management with 17 reviews while PingAccess is ranked 15th in Access Management with 1 review. CyberArk Identity is rated 8.2, while PingAccess is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Identity writes "Allows Linux and Unix administrators to login with single password ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PingAccess writes "A hybrid lightweight solution that simplifies web management ". CyberArk Identity is most compared with Microsoft Intune, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint IdentityIQ and PingFederate, whereas PingAccess is most compared with Symantec Siteminder and ForgeRock.
See our list of best Access Management vendors.
We monitor all Access Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
