CyberArk Privileged Access Security vs FireEye Network Security

CyberArk Privileged Access Security is ranked 2nd in Advanced Threat Protection with 56 reviews vs FireEye Network Security which is ranked 3rd in Advanced Threat Protection with 3 reviews. The top reviewer of CyberArk Privileged Access Security writes "Gives us the security of all credentials in one place and lightens our administrative load". The top reviewer of FireEye Network Security writes "It added a layer of inspection that might be missed by traditional IPS or antivirus products. Features such as IPS are lacking". CyberArk Privileged Access Security is most compared with BeyondTrust PowerBroker, Cisco Identity Services Engine and Oracle Identity Manager (Oracle IAM). FireEye Network Security is most compared with Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Sourcefire Firewalls and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection. See our CyberArk Privileged Access Security vs FireEye Network Security report.
Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
+Add products to compare
Most Helpful Review
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Access Security vs FireEye Network Security and others in Advanced Threat Protection.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Quotes From Members Comparing CyberArk Privileged Access Security vs FireEye Network Security

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
The voice technology is very good.It is very simple to use.CyberArk is not just an IT security or cybersecurity tool. It's also an administrator tool. I had a fair number of systems where the passwords were not fully managed by CyberArk yet, and they were expiring every 30 or 45 days. I was able to get management turned on for those accounts. From an administrator perspective, I didn't have to go back into those systems and manually change those passwords anymore. CyberArk... lightened the load on our administrative work.You can write different types of policies for custom business needs or any developer needs. If they need certain functions allocated, they can be customized easily.We can make a policy that affects everybody instantly.We have accomplished our security goals. We have two-factor authenticated and vaulted our important accounts, so people can't just steal stuff from us.The flexibility of integrating with other technologies is important because of a lot of applications - a lot of COTS products - are not supported when we are bringing the application IDs. The CyberArk platform provides a lot of opportunities to do customization.We are maintaining compliance in PCI, SOX and HIPPA, which is a big thing. Auditors really like it, and it has made us stay compliant.

Read more »

Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security.The MVX Engine seems to be very capable against threats and the way it handles APTs is impressive.

Read more »

Cons
The initial setup was somewhat complex.This is probably a common thing, but they do ask for a lot of log files, a lot of information. They ask you to provide a lot of information to them before they're willing to give you anything at all upfront. It would be better if they were a little more give-and-take upfront: "Why don't you try these couple of things while we take your log files and stuff and go research them?" A little bit of that might be more helpful.The interface on version 9 looks old.One of our current issues is a publishing issue. If we whitelist Google Chrome, all the events of Google Chrome should be gone. It is not happening.CyberArk has a lot on the privileged access side but they have to concentrate more on the application side as well.Make it easier to deploy.There is some stuff that we still have not fully integrated, which is our AIM solution. We are having all types of issues with it. I have been working with Level 3 support on it, but otherwise, from a functionality perspective, everything has been working except for the AIM solution. We had an issue with the Copy feature... Apparently, in version 10, that Copy feature does not work. You actually have to click Show and then copy the password from within Show and then paste it. We've had a million tickets and we had to figure out a workaround to it.

Read more »

There is a lot of room for Improvement in the offering, from cost to functionality. It is pretty straightforward to implement which is an advantage. However, it falls short in pricing, detection capabilities, and, most importantly, reporting and policy management.It would be great if we could create granular reports based on the protocols, types of attacks, regions of attack, etc. Also we would like to easily be able to add exceptions to rules in cases of false positives.Stability issues manifested in terms of throughput maximization.Management of the appliance could be greatly improved.

Read more »

Pricing and Cost Advice
With reducing the privileged account access, there has been a huge improvement. They are now bringing more accounts on a little at a time.If you are looking at implementing this solution, buy the training and go to it.Our risk is definitely significantly lower. Also, our resources are low.The cost is high compared to other products.CyberArk provides all the features bundled. This is compared to other vendors who provide them as a different license for each functionality.Cost efficiency is the number one thing that can be improved in my mind. This would change lots of companies minds on purchasing the product.It can be an expensive product.It is not a cheap solution. It is expensive as compared with other solutions. However, it is one of the best solutions in their domain.

Read more »

Information Not Available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection solutions are best for your needs.
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Ranking
RANKING
Views
31,688
Comparisons
16,752
Reviews
56
Followers
1,608
Avg. Rating
8.6
Views
21,233
Comparisons
11,201
Reviews
2
Followers
437
Avg. Rating
7.0
Top Comparisons
Top ComparisonsSee more CyberArk Privileged Access Security competitors »See more FireEye Network Security competitors »
Also Known As
Also Known AsCyberArk Privileged Account Security, SSH Key Manager, Privileged Session Manager, Privileged Threat Analytics, Application Identity Manager, On-Demand Privileges Manager, Endpoint Privilege ManagerFireEye
Website/Video
Website/VideoCyberArk
FireEye
Overview
Overview

CyberArk is the trusted expert in privileged account security. Designed from the ground up with a focus on security, CyberArk has developed a powerful, modular technology platform that provides the industry's most comprehensive Privileged Account Security Solution.

FireEye Network Security is an advanced threat protection and breach detection platform that provides industry leading threat visibility and protection against the world’s most sophisticated and damaging attacks. By leveraging FireEye’s unique technologies and threat intelligence, FireEye Network Security detects what other security solutions miss, providing holistic security from the perimeter to the network core.

OFFER
Learn more about CyberArk Privileged Access Security
Learn more about FireEye Network Security
Sample Customers
Sample CustomersRockwell AutomationFFRDC, Finansbank, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Investis, Kelsey-Seybold Clinic, Bank of Thailand, City of Miramar, Citizens National Bank, D-Wave Systems
Top Industries
Top Industries
REVIEWERS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Insurance Company
15%
Healthcare Company
12%
Retailer
9%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
29%
Insurance Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Financial Services Firm
27%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Government
6%
Healthcare Company
5%
Company Size
Company Size
REVIEWERS
Small Business
21%
Midsize Enterprise
10%
Large Enterprise
69%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
17%
Midsize Enterprise
23%
Large Enterprise
60%
REVIEWERS
Small Business
44%
Midsize Enterprise
25%
Large Enterprise
31%
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business
33%
Midsize Enterprise
19%
Large Enterprise
48%
Find out what your peers are saying about CyberArk Privileged Access Security vs FireEye Network Security and others in Advanced Threat Protection.
Download now
287,901 professionals have used our research since 2012.
We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.

Sign Up with Email